Dose cluster model parameterization of the parotid gland in irradiation of head and neck cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Chao, Ming [1 ]
Wei, Jie [2 ]
Lo, Yeh-Chi [1 ]
Penagaricano, Jose A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] CUNY City Coll, Dept Comp Sci, New York, NY 10031 USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[4] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
关键词
Cluster model; Normal tissue complication probability; Parotid gland toxicity; Head and neck cancer; Intensity modulated radiation therapy; NORMAL TISSUE COMPLICATION; RADIATION-INDUCED COMPLICATIONS; CERVICAL-SPINAL-CORD; PROBABILITY NTCP; PARALLEL ARCHITECTURE; RADIOTHERAPY; XEROSTOMIA; THERAPY; FORMULA; METRICS;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-019-00829-3
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
To explore the parotid normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modeling with percolation-based dose clusters for head-and-neck patients receiving concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Cluster models incorporating the spatial dose distribution in the parotid gland were developed to evaluate the radiation induced complication. Cluster metrics including the mean cluster size (NMCS) and the largest cluster size both normalized by the gland volume (NSLC) were evaluated and scrutinized against the benchmark NTCP. Two fitting strategies to the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model using the maximum likelihood method were devised: the volume parameter n fixed at 1.0 (mean dose model) and unrestricted (full LKB model). The fitted parameters TD50 and m were assessed with the LKB NTCP models with the available xerostomia data. NSLC was a better metric than NMCS with reference to the LKB model and strong correlation (r similar to 0.95) was observed between NTCP and NSLC. The mean dose model returned the parameter TD50 (39.9 Gy) and m (0.4) from the NSLC of threshold dose at around 40 Gy. Drastically different TD50 and m values were obtained from the fittings via the full LKB model, where the threshold dose would be near 27 Gy. Bootstrapping analyses further confirmed the fitting outcomes. Strong correlation with the traditional NTCP models revealed that the cluster model could achieve what NTCP models attain and may offer additional information. Parameterization of the model indicated that the model could have different predictions from current clinical recommendations. Further investigation using toxicity data is under way to validate the cluster model.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 153
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dose cluster model parameterization of the parotid gland in irradiation of head and neck cancer
    Ming Chao
    Jie Wei
    Yeh-Chi Lo
    José A. Peñagarícano
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2020, 43 : 143 - 153
  • [2] A COMPARISON OF DOSE-RESPONSE MODELS FOR THE PAROTID GLAND IN A LARGE GROUP OF HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER PATIENTS
    Houweling, Antonetta C.
    Philippens, Marielle E. P.
    Dijkema, Tim
    Roesink, Judith M.
    Terhaard, Chris H. J.
    Schilstra, Cornelis
    Ten Haken, Randall K.
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (04): : 1259 - 1265
  • [3] Parotid Gland Sparing With Helical Tomotherapy in Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Voordeckers, Mia
    Farrag, Ashraf
    Everaert, Hendrik
    Tournel, Koen
    Storme, Guy
    Verellen, Dirk
    De Ridder, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (02): : 443 - 448
  • [4] Dose-response relationships within the parotid gland after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
    Bussels, B
    Maes, A
    Flamen, P
    Lambin, P
    Erven, K
    Hermans, R
    Nuyts, S
    Weltens, C
    Cecere, S
    Lesaffre, E
    Van den Bogaert, W
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 (03) : 297 - 306
  • [5] A comparison of mean parotid gland dose with measures of parotid gland function after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: Implications for future trials
    Roesink, JM
    Schipper, M
    Busschers, W
    Raaijmakers, CPJ
    Terhaard, CHJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (04): : 1006 - 1009
  • [6] Evaluation of Parotid Gland Dose Rate following Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer
    Hong, Joo-Wan
    Cho, Jae-Hwan
    Won, Hui-Su
    Moon, Deog-Hwan
    SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS, 2015, 48 (03) : 217 - 221
  • [7] Exploring spatial dose information in the parotid gland for xerostomia prediction and local dose patterns in head and neck cancer radiotherapy
    Chao, Ming
    Tomalin, Lewis
    Wei, Jie
    Liu, Tian
    Zhang, Jiahan
    Liu, Jerry
    Penagaricano, Jose A.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2025, 11 (02):
  • [8] Impact of Node Negative Target Volume Delineation on Contralateral Parotid Gland Dose Sparing Using IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer
    Magnuson, William J.
    Urban, Erich
    Bayliss, R. Adam
    Harari, Paul M.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2015, 14 (03) : 315 - 319
  • [9] Parotid gland sparing in patients undergoing bilateral head and neck irradiation: Techniques and early results
    Eisbruch, A
    Ship, JA
    Martel, MK
    TenHaken, RK
    Marsh, LH
    Wolf, GT
    Esclamado, RM
    Bradford, CR
    Terrell, JE
    Gebarski, SS
    Lichter, AS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 36 (02): : 469 - 480
  • [10] Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer
    Eisbruch, A
    Kim, HM
    Terrell, JE
    Marsh, LH
    Dawson, LA
    Ship, JA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (03): : 695 - 704