Detrimental effects of using negative sentences in the autobiographical IAT

被引:11
作者
Agosta, Sara [1 ]
Mega, Anna [1 ]
Sartori, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Psychol, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
Autobiographical IAT; Mock-crime; Negative sentences; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; VALIDITY; SALIENCE; LIE;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.011
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT) is a method that accurately identifies which one of two contrasting autobiographical events is true for the subject. The aIAT indexes the real autobiographical event (e.g. I was in Paris for Christmas) on the basis of the facilitating effect because it maps the real autobiographical event with true sentences (e.g. I am in front of a computer) on the same motor response. In this paper we focus on the conditions under which the autobiographical IAT accurately and reliably identifies autobiographical memories. A recent study showed a reduction in the accuracy of the aIAT when negative sentences are used. We have investigated the detrimental effect on aIAT accuracy of such negative sentence items, used to describe autobiographical events, compared with affirmative sentence items. While we highlight the reliability of the results obtained using negative sentences, we also show that the use of affirmative sentences in describing autobiographical events guarantees high accuracy and reliability of results in identifying the true autobiographical event. Finally, we summarise the criteria for preparing stimuli for an effective aIAT in order to maximise correct classifications of individual subjects. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 275
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Agosta S., 2010, APPL COGNIT IN PRESS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, INT WHIPL TRAUM C MI
[3]   The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta-analytic review [J].
Ben-Shakhar, G ;
Elaad, E .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (01) :131-151
[4]   How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the implicit association test [J].
Brendl, CM ;
Markman, AB ;
Messner, C .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (05) :760-773
[5]   Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the implicit association test: Comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004) [J].
Greenwald, AG ;
Nosek, BA ;
Banaji, MR ;
Klauer, KC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2005, 134 (03) :420-425
[6]   Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test [J].
Greenwald, AG ;
McGhee, DE ;
Schwartz, JLK .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (06) :1464-1480
[7]   Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm [J].
Greenwald, AG ;
Nosek, BA ;
Banaji, MR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (02) :197-216
[8]   Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI [J].
Langleben, DD ;
Loughead, JW ;
Bilker, WB ;
Ruparel, K ;
Childress, AR ;
Busch, SI ;
Gur, RC .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2005, 26 (04) :262-272
[9]  
Lykken D.T., 1998, TREMOR BLOOD USES AB, V2
[10]   THE VALIDITY OF THE GUILTY KNOWLEDGE TECHNIQUE - THE EFFECTS OF FAKING [J].
LYKKEN, DT .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 44 (04) :258-262