Evaluation of a Rapid Antigen Test To Detect SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Identify Potentially Infectious Individuals

被引:52
|
作者
Korenkov, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Poopalasingam, Nareshkumar [1 ,2 ]
Madler, Matthias [1 ,2 ]
Vanshylla, Kanika [1 ,2 ]
Eggeling, Ralf [3 ]
Wirtz, Maike [1 ,2 ]
Fish, Irina [1 ,2 ]
Dewald, Felix [1 ,2 ]
Gieselmann, Lutz [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lehmann, Clara [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Fatkenheuer, Gerd [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Gruell, Henning [1 ,2 ]
Pfeifer, Nico [3 ,7 ,8 ]
Heger, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Klein, Florian [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Inst Virol, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, Dept Comp Sci, Methods Med Informat, Tubingen, Germany
[4] German Ctr Infect Res, Partner Site Bonn Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med 1, Cologne, Germany
[6] Univ Cologne, Ctr Mol Med Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[7] Univ Tubingen, Fac Med, Tubingen, Germany
[8] German Ctr Infect Res, Partner Site Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; antigen test; RT-qPCR; virus culture; infectiousness; COVID-19; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.00896-21
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The identification and isolation of highly infectious SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals is an important public health strategy. Rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are promising tools for large-scale screenings due to timely results and feasibility for on-site testing. Nonetheless, the diagnostic performance of RADT in detecting infectious individuals is not yet fully determined. In this study, RT-qPCR and virus culture of RT-qPCR-positive samples were used to evaluate and compare the performance of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test in detecting SARS-CoV-2-infected and possibly infectious individuals. To this end, two combined oro- and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected at a routine SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic center. A total of 2,028 samples were tested, and 118 virus cultures were inoculated. SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in 210 samples by RT-qPCR, representing a positive rate of 1036%. The Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test yielded a positive result in 92 (4.54%) samples resulting in an overall sensitivity and specificity of 42.86 and 99.89%, respectively. For adjusted C-T values of <20 (n = 14), <25 (n = 57), and <30 (n = 88), the RADT reached sensitivities of 100, 9825, and 88.64%, respectively. All 29 culture-positive samples were detected by the RADT. Although the overall sensitivity was low, the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test reliably detected patients with high RNA loads. In addition, negative RADT results fully corresponded with the lack of viral cultivability in Vero E6 cells. These results indicate that RADT can be a valuable tool for the detection of individuals with high RNA loads that are likely to transmit SARS-CoV-2.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of the EasyNAT SARS-CoV-2 assay PCR test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Fernandez-Sanchez, Fernando
    Martin-Bautista, Elena
    Rivas-Ruiz, Francisco
    Wu, Winnie
    Garcia-Aranda, Marilina
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2024, 326
  • [22] Evaluation of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antibody Test in Samples from Vaccinated Individuals
    Hayer, Johannes
    Urlaub, Eva
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (03):
  • [23] Urgent need of rapid tests for SARS CoV-2 antigen detection: Evaluation of the SD-Biosensor antigen test for SARS-CoV-2
    Cerutti, Francesco
    Burdino, Elisa
    Milia, Maria Grazia
    Allice, Tiziano
    Gregori, Gabriella
    Bruzzone, Bianca
    Ghisetti, Valeria
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 132
  • [24] Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antigen test to the real star Sars-CoV-2 RT PCR kit
    Kruettgen, Alexander
    Cornelissen, Christian G.
    Dreher, Michael
    Hornef, Mathias W.
    Imoehl, Matthias
    Kleines, Michael
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 288
  • [25] Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: Potential to help reduce community spread?
    Toptan, Tuna
    Eckermann, Lisa
    Pfeiffer, Annika E.
    Hoehl, Sebastian
    Ciesek, Sandra
    Drosten, Christian
    Corman, Victor M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 135
  • [26] Evaluation of an Antigen Detection Rapid Diagnostic Test for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples
    Lam, Athene Hoi-Ying
    Leung, Ka-Yi
    Zhang, Ruiqi
    Liu, Danlei
    Fan, Yujing
    Tam, Anthony Raymond
    Yip, Cyril Chik-Yan
    Cheng, Vincent Chi-Chung
    Yuen, Kwok-Yung
    Hung, Ivan Fan-Ngai
    Chan, Kwok-Hung
    COVID, 2021, 1 (04): : 775 - 783
  • [27] Field evaluation of the performance of a SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic test in Uganda using nasopharyngeal samples
    Nalumansi, Aminah
    Lutalo, Tom
    Kayiwa, John
    Watera, Christine
    Balinandi, Stephen
    Kiconco, Jocelyn
    Nakaseegu, Joweria
    Olara, Denis
    Odwilo, Emmanuel
    Serwanga, Jennifer
    Kikaire, Bernard
    Ssemwanga, Deogratius
    Nabadda, Susan
    Ssewanyana, Isaac
    Atwine, Diane
    Mwebesa, Henry
    Bosa, Henry Kyobe
    Nsereko, Christopher
    Cotten, Matthew
    Downing, Robert
    Lutwama, Julius
    Kaleebu, Pontiano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 104 : 282 - 286
  • [28] Evaluation of Four Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection with Nasopharyngeal Swabs
    Lim, Ho-Jae
    Park, Min-Young
    Baek, Young-Hyun
    Lee, Hyeon-Seo
    Kim, Inhee
    Kwon, Youngjin
    You, Youngshin
    Nam, Kyoungwoo
    Yang, Jae-Hyun
    Kim, Min-Jin
    Yu, Nae
    Sohn, Yong-Hak
    Park, Jung-Eun
    Yang, Yong-Jin
    BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (03)
  • [29] Comparison of Rapid and Automated Antigen Detection Tests for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
    Petonnet, Dorian
    Marot, Stephane
    Leroy, Isabelle
    Cohier, Julien
    Ramahefasolo, Charline
    Mansaly, Safietou
    Calvez, Vincent
    Marcelin, Anne-Genevieve
    Burrel, Sonia
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [30] Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Dinnes, Jacqueline
    Sharma, Pawana
    Berhane, Sarah
    van Wyk, Susanna S.
    Nyaaba, Nicholas
    Domen, Julie
    Taylor, Melissa
    Cunningham, Jane
    Davenport, Clare
    Dittrich, Sabine
    Emperador, Devy
    Hooft, Lotty
    Leeflang, Mariska M. G.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Spijker, Rene
    Verbakel, Jan Y.
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Taylor-Phillips, Sian
    Van den Bruel, Ann
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (07):