Laminaria vs. vaginal misoprostol for cervical preparation before A second-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized clinical trial

被引:6
作者
Sagiv, Ron [1 ]
Mizrachi, Yossi
Glickman, Hagit
Kerner, Ram
Keidar, Ran
Bar, Jacob
Golan, Abraham
机构
[1] E Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, IL-58100 Holon, Israel
关键词
Cervical preparation; Misoprostol; Laminaria; Surgical abortion; UTERINE PERFORATION; CURETTAGE ABORTION; ORAL MISOPROSTOL; 1ST TRIMESTER; TERMINATION; PREGNANCY; PREVENTION; EVACUATION; DILATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.018
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of vaginal misoprostol and laminaria for cervical preparation before second-trimester surgical abortion. Study design: We performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing midnight administration of misoprostol 600 mcg vaginally to midnight placement of laminaria, before surgical abortions among women at 13-20 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was preoperative cervical dilation. Secondary outcomes were the need for further dilation, procedure duration and difficulty, immediate complications and side effects. Results: Eighty-four women were randomized, with a median gestational age of 16.5 weeks. The mean time interval between misoprostol and laminaria placement and dilatation and evacuation initiation was 11.0 +/- 2.9 and 11.2 +/- 2.0 h, respectively (p=.17). Cervical dilation was not greater in the laminaria group as compared to the misoprostol group (12.8 vs. 12.4 mm, respectively; p=.32). No difference was demonstrated regarding the need for additional dilation or the difficulty of the procedure. Procedures performed after laminaria insertion were 1 min longer (median 11 vs. 10 min, p=.04). Participants found laminaria placement more uncomfortable than vaginal misoprostol placement. Other than pain, additional side effects occurred only in the misoprostol group, primarily nausea and vomiting. One participant in the misoprostol group experienced fetal expulsion during the night before the intended procedure. Conclusion: Either vaginal misoprostol or laminaria provides adequate dilation for second-trimester surgical abortion. Laminaria causes more pain at insertion and misoprostol causes more side effects. Implications statement: We found that cervical preparation in an inpatient setting for approximately 11 h with misoprostol 600 mcg vaginally is comparable to 11 h of laminaria. However, given the potential for spontaneous expulsion and more side effects with misoprostol, laminaria is likely a better general option in such a setting. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 411
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Buccal misoprostol plus laminaria for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 21-23 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial
    Drey, Eleanor A.
    Benson, Lyndsey S.
    Sokoloff, Abby
    Steinauer, Jody E.
    Roy, Genevieve
    Jackson, Rebecca A.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 89 (04) : 307 - 313
  • [42] Uterine Artery Embolization of Cervical Varices Before Second-Trimester Abortion
    Lesko, Jennifer
    Carusi, Daniela
    Shipp, Thomas D.
    Dutton, Caryn
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (02) : 458 - 462
  • [43] Adjunctive Agents for Cervical Preparation in Second Trimester Surgical Abortion
    Jessika A. Ralph
    Lee P. Shulman
    Advances in Therapy, 2019, 36 : 1246 - 1251
  • [44] Prevalence and risk factors of inadequate cervical dilation following laminaria insertion in second-trimester abortion - case control study
    Ben-Ami, Ido
    Stern, Sharon
    Vaknin, Zvi
    Smorgick, Noam
    Schneider, David
    Halperin, Reuvit
    CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 91 (04) : 308 - 312
  • [45] Buccal Misoprostol Compared With Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator Before Surgical Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bartz, Deborah
    Maurer, Rie
    Allen, Rebecca H.
    Fortin, Jennifer
    Kuang, Bernice
    Goldberg, Alisa B.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [46] Comparison of Effectiveness of Laminaria versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Preparation Before Operative Hysteroscopy in Women of Reproductive Age: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Karakus, Savas
    Akkar, Ozlem Bozoklu
    Yildiz, Caglar
    Yenicesu, Gonca Imir
    Cetin, Meral
    Cetin, Ali
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [47] Simultaneous Administration Compared With a 24-Hour Mifepristone-Misoprostol Interval in Second-Trimester Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Abbas, Dina Fatima
    Blum, Jennifer
    Nguyen Thi Nhu Ngoc
    Nguyen Thi Bach Nga
    Chi, Huynh Thi Kim
    Martin, Roxanne
    Winikoff, Beverly
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 128 (05) : 1077 - 1083
  • [48] Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol (400 μg) for cervical priming in first-trimester abortion:: a randomized trial
    Carbonell Esteve, Josep Lluis
    Mari, Jose Maria
    Valero, Francisco
    Llorente, Margardel
    Salvador, Immaculada
    Varela, Lidia
    Leal, Pedro
    Candel, Ana
    Tudela, Ana
    Serrano, Maria
    Munoz, Eva
    CONTRACEPTION, 2006, 74 (04) : 328 - 333
  • [49] Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol or Ethacridine Lactate and Oxytocin for Second Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Trial
    Dadhwal, Vatsla
    Garimella, Sita
    Khoiwal, Kavita
    Sharma, K. Aparna
    Perumal, Vanamail
    Deka, Dipika
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (03) : 262 - 266
  • [50] Cervical preparation for surgical abortion between 12 and 18 weeks of gestation using vaginal misoprostol and Dilapan-S
    Wilson, Leah C.
    Meyn, Leslie A.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 83 (06) : 511 - 516