Detailed Revision Risk Analysis after Single- vs. Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Retrospective Tertiary Center Analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Tuecking, Lars-Rene [1 ]
Silligmann, Julia [1 ]
Savov, Peter [1 ]
Omar, Mohamed [2 ]
Windhagen, Henning [1 ]
Ettinger, Max [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Anna Von Borries Str I-7, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Trauma Surg, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
来源
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL | 2021年 / 10卷 / 10期
关键词
periprosthetic joint infection; PJI; single-stage revision TKA; two-stage revision TKA; revision risk; rTKA; STAGE EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.3390/antibiotics10101177
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most common causes of revision knee arthroplasty. Controversy continues to surround the proper operative technique of PJI in knee arthroplasty with single- or two-stage replacement. Significant variations are seen in the eradication rates of PJI and in implant survival rates. This detailed retrospective analysis of a single tertiary center is intended to provide further data and insight comparing single- and two-stage revision surgery. A retrospective analysis of all revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgeries from 2013 to 2019 was performed and screened with respect to single- or two-stage TKA revisions. Single- and two-stage revisions were analyzed with regard to implant survival, revision rate, microbiological spectrum, and other typical demographic characteristics. A total of 63 patients were included, with 15 patients undergoing single-stage revision and 48 patients undergoing two-stage revision. The mean follow-up time was 40.7 to 43.7 months. Statistically, no difference was found between both groups in overall survival (54.4% vs. 70.1%, p = 0.68) and implant survival with respect to reinfection (71.4% vs. 82.4%, p = 0.48). Further, high reinfection rates were found for patients with difficult-to-treat organisms and low- to semi-constrained implant types, in comparison to constrained implant types. A statistically comparable revision rate for recurrence of infection could be shown for both groups, although a tendency to higher reinfection rate for single-stage change was evident. The revision rate in this single-center study was comparably high, which could be caused by the high comorbidity and high proportion of difficult-to-treat bacteria in patients at a tertiary center. In this patient population, the expectation of implant survival should be critically discussed with patients.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection after hip and knee arthroplasty
    Straub, J.
    Staats, K.
    Vertesich, K.
    Kowalscheck, L.
    Windhager, R.
    Boehler, C.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2024, 106B (04): : 372 - 379
  • [2] Reinfection after two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection of total knee arthroplasty
    Bernd Kubista
    Robert U. Hartzler
    Christina M. Wood
    Douglas R. Osmon
    Arlen D. Hanssen
    David G. Lewallen
    International Orthopaedics, 2012, 36 : 65 - 71
  • [3] Reinfection after two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection of total knee arthroplasty
    Kubista, Bernd
    Hartzler, Robert U.
    Wood, Christina M.
    Osmon, Douglas R.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Lewallen, David G.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 36 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [4] The Fate and Relevance of the Patella in Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Buller, Leonard T.
    Eccles, Christian J.
    Deckard, Evan R.
    Ziemba-Davis, Mary
    Meneghini, R. Michael
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (10): : 2090 - 2096
  • [5] Risk of Instability After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Menken, Luke G.
    Berliner, Zachary P.
    Korshunov, Yevgeniy
    Cooper, H. John
    Hepinstall, Matthew S.
    Scuderi, Giles R.
    Rodriguez, Jose A.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 45 (03) : 145 - +
  • [6] Two-stage revision arthroplasty for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis periprosthetic joint infection: An outcome analysis
    Chang, Chih-Hsiang
    Hu, Chih-Chien
    Chang, Yuhan
    Hsieh, Pang-Hsin
    Shih, Hsin-Nung
    Ueng, Steve Wen-Neng
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (09):
  • [7] Arthroplasty-center related retrospective analysis of risk factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after primary and after revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Radtke, Kerstin
    Tetzlaff, T.
    Vaske, B.
    Ettinger, M.
    Claassen, L.
    Floerkemeier, T.
    Windhagen, H.
    von Lewinski, G.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2016, 24 (05) : 721 - 728
  • [8] Two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty
    Fowler, Timothy J.
    Sayers, Adrian
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [9] Difficulty of diagnostic accuracy of periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective analysis of revision surgery of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in a tertiary hospital
    Andres, Alexander Herbert
    Chaold-Loesing, Juliette-Afi
    Bulok, Hendrik
    Willburger, Roland Ernst
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [10] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
    Christian Hipfl
    Vincent Leopold
    Luis Becker
    Matthias Pumberger
    Carsten Perka
    Sebastian Hardt
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 4481 - 4490