Affine invariance of meta-heuristic algorithms

被引:10
|
作者
Jian, ZhongQuan [1 ]
Zhu, GuangYu [1 ]
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Mech Engn & Automat, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Particle swarm optimization; Differential evolution; Optimal Foraging Algorithm; Coordinate system; Affine invariance; Meta-heuristic algorithms; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.062
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
An algorithm whose performance depends on the objective function being aligned with a privileged coordinate system is a poor choice in general because it is unlikely that the opti-mal orientation will be known in advance. In this paper, a property of meta-heuristic algo-rithms, named affine invariance, is introduced to verify whether the algorithm is depended on the privileged coordinate system or not. The concept of affine invariance is described in detail, and some classical algorithms, efficient in most test and actual problems, are proved to be affine invariant. While some recent algorithms in the literature are proved to be not affine invariant. As a conclusion, particle swarm optimization (PSO), differential evolution (DE) and optimal foraging algorithm (OFA) are affine invariant, while grey wolf optimizer (GWO), sine cosine algorithm (SCA) and butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA) are not affine invariant. Furthermore, comparison tests are designed to support the theoretical analysis results. In these tests, same random numbers and initial population are used to avoid the influence of randomness, thus, the conclusion is reliable. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 53
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance Comparison of Population-Based Meta-Heuristic Algorithms in Affine Template Matching
    Sato, Junya
    Yamada, Takayoshi
    Ito, Kazuaki
    Akashi, Takuya
    IEEJ TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2021, 16 (01) : 117 - 126
  • [2] Reviews of the meta-heuristic algorithms for TSP
    Gao, Hai-Chang
    Feng, Bo-Qin
    Zhu, Li
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2006, 21 (03): : 241 - 247
  • [3] Image Segmentation Using Meta-heuristic Algorithms
    Saxena, Varun
    Goel, Deeksha
    Rawat, Tarun Kumar
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, POWER AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (GUCON), 2018, : 661 - 666
  • [4] Significance Relations for the Benchmarking of Meta-Heuristic Algorithms
    Koeppen, Mario
    Ohnishi, Kei
    2013 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS (ISDA), 2013, : 253 - 258
  • [5] Groundwater Model Calibration by Meta-Heuristic Algorithms
    O. Bozorg Haddad
    M. Mohammad Rezapour Tabari
    E. Fallah-Mehdipour
    M. A. Mariño
    Water Resources Management, 2013, 27 : 2515 - 2529
  • [6] Estimation of Muskingum parameter by meta-heuristic algorithms
    Orouji, Hossein
    Bozorg-Haddad, Omid
    Fallah-Mehdipour, Elahe
    Marino, Miguel A.
    Barati, Reza
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER MANAGEMENT, 2014, 167 (06) : 365 - 367
  • [7] Groundwater Model Calibration by Meta-Heuristic Algorithms
    Bozorg-Haddad, Omid
    Tabari, M. Mohammad Rezapour
    Fallah-Mehdipour, E.
    Marino, M. A.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2013, 27 (07) : 2515 - 2529
  • [8] Comparison of meta-heuristic algorithms for clustering rectangles
    Burke, E
    Kendall, G
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 37 (1-2) : 383 - 386
  • [9] Overview of Parallel Computing for Meta-Heuristic Algorithms
    Sun, Ying
    Chu, Shu-Chuan
    Hu, Pei
    Watada, Junzo
    Si, Mingchao
    Pan, Jeng-Shyang
    Journal of Network Intelligence, 2022, 7 (03): : 656 - 681
  • [10] Meta-Heuristic Algorithms for Hydrologic Frequency Analysis
    Yousef Hassanzadeh
    Amin Abdi
    Siamak Talatahari
    Vijay P. Singh
    Water Resources Management, 2011, 25 : 1855 - 1879