A new challenge to conceptual engineering

被引:15
作者
Koch, Steffen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Philosophy Sci, Dept Hist & Philosophy Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY | 2021年
关键词
Conceptual engineering; explication; concepts; attractors; feasibility; innateness; INNATENESS; BIRDSONG;
D O I
10.1080/0020174X.2021.1967190
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article examines a new challenge for the feasibility of conceptual engineering: 'the attractor challenge'. I argue that the prospects of reforming some concepts are poor because of their psychological nature. They are attractors: The mind is drawn to think with them, and engineering efforts are unlikely to succeed in replacing these concepts. The attractor challenge is illustrated by a substantial body of experimental research on the concept of innateness.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On Rortian conceptual engineering
    Huang, Yuanfan
    [J]. METAPHILOSOPHY, 2025, 56 (01) : 109 - 125
  • [32] Inferentialist conceptual engineering
    Jorem, Sigurd
    Lohr, Guido
    [J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2024, 67 (03): : 932 - 953
  • [33] Conceptual engineering: conceptual change or change in meaning?
    Torres, Erika
    Le Corre, Mathieu
    [J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2025,
  • [34] The "should' in conceptual engineering
    Simion, Mona
    [J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2018, 61 (08): : 914 - 928
  • [35] Disability studies, conceptual engineering, and conceptual activism
    Cantalamessa, Elizabeth Amber
    [J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 64 (1-2): : 46 - 75
  • [36] If conceptual engineering is a new method in the ethics of AI, what method is it exactly?
    Guido Löhr
    [J]. AI and Ethics, 2024, 4 (2): : 575 - 585
  • [37] Carnap meets Foucault: conceptual engineering and genealogical investigations
    Novaes, Catarina Dutilh
    [J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2020,
  • [38] CARNAP'S CONDITIONS OF ADEQUACY FOR EXPLICATIONS AND CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING
    Feldbacher-Escamilla, Christian J.
    [J]. LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE, 2021, (256) : 487 - 509
  • [39] Conceptual Dynamite: An Argument for Thoughtful Language in Conceptual Engineering
    Luan, Bell
    [J]. DIALOGUE-CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2024, 63 (03) : 467 - 474
  • [40] Construction and continuity: conceptual engineering without conceptual change
    Jackman, Henry
    [J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2020, 63 (9-10): : 909 - 918