Importance of quality in breast cancer screening practice - a natural experiment in Alberta, Canada

被引:8
作者
Yuan, Yan [1 ]
Vu, Khanh [1 ]
Shen, Ye [1 ]
Dickinson, James [2 ]
Winget, Marcy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Sch Publ Hlth, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
quality in health care; public health; oncology; AVERAGE-RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; DIAGNOSIS; RATES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028766
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Regular breast cancer screening is a widely used cancer prevention strategy. Important quality indicators of screening include cancer detection rate, false positive rate, benign biopsy rate and post-screen invasive cancer rate. We compared quality indicators of community radiology clinics to those of 'Screen Test', which feature centralised batch reading and quality control processes. Both types of providers operated under a single provincial Breast Cancer Screening Programme. Setting Community radiology clinics are operated by independent fee-for-service radiologists serving large and small communities throughout the Canadian province of Alberta. Launched by the provincial cancer agency, the Screen Test operates two physical clinics serving metropolises and mobile units serving remote regions. Eligible women may self-refer to any provider for screening mammography. Participants Women aged 50 to 69 years who had at least one screening mammogram between July 2006 and June 2010 in Alberta were included. Women with missing health region information or prior breast cancer diagnosis were excluded. Results A total of 389 788 screening mammograms were analysed, of which 12.7% were performed by Screen Test. Compared with Screen Test during 2006 to 2008, community radiology clinics had a lower cancer detection rate (3.6 vs 4.6 per 1000 screens, risk ratio (RR): 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.98) and a much higher false positive rate (9.4% vs 3.4%, RR: 2.72, 95% CI: 2.55 to 2.90). Most other performance indicators were also better in Screen Test overall and across all health regions. These performance indicators were similar during 2008 to 2010, showing no improvement with time. Conclusions Screen Test has a quality assurance process in place and performed significantly better. This provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of a quality assurance process and may explain some of the large differences in breast cancer screening indicators between provinces and countries with formal programmes and those without.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Alberta Health Services, 2017, SCREEN TEST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Organized Breast Cancer Screening Programs in Canada: Report on Program Performance in 2007 and 2008
[3]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2017, AUSTR I HLTH WELF CA, V104
[4]   Performance of systematic and non-systematic ('opportunistic') screening mammography: a comparative study from Denmark [J].
Bihrmann, Kristine ;
Jensen, Allan ;
Olsen, Anne Helene ;
Nijor, Sisse ;
Schwartz, Walter ;
Veiborg, Ilse ;
Lynge, Elsebeth .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2008, 15 (01) :23-26
[5]   Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Calonge, Ned ;
Petitti, Diana B. ;
DeWitt, Thomas G. ;
Dietrich, Allen J. ;
Gregory, Kimberly D. ;
Grossman, David ;
Isham, George ;
LeFevre, Michael L. ;
Leipzig, Rosanne M. ;
Marion, Lucy N. ;
Melnyk, Bernadette ;
Moyer, Virginia A. ;
Ockene, Judith K. ;
Sawaya, George F. ;
Schwartz, J. Sanford ;
Wilt, Timothy .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (10) :716-W236
[6]  
Canadian Association of Radiologists (car), 2016, CAR PRACT GUID TECHN
[7]  
Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 2012, EV IND WORK GROUP RE
[8]   Performance measures from 10 years of breast screening in the Ontario Breast Screening Program, 1990/91 to 2000 [J].
Chiarelli, AM ;
Halapy, E ;
Nadalin, V ;
Shumak, R ;
O'Malley, F ;
Mai, V .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (01) :34-42
[9]   False-positive Screening Mammograms and Biopsies Among Women Participating in a Canadian Provincial Breast Screening Program [J].
Coldman, Andrew J. ;
Phillips, Norman .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2012, 103 (06) :E420-E424
[10]   Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years [J].
Dickinson, J. ;
Singh, H. ;
Birtwhistle, R. ;
Lewin, G. ;
Joffres, M. ;
Gorber, S. Connor ;
Tonelli, M. .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2011, 183 (17) :1991-2001