Gaming analysis in joint energy and spinning reserve markets

被引:63
作者
Haghighat, Hossein [1 ]
Seifi, Hossein
Kian, Ashkan R.
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, CIPCE, Tehran, Iran
关键词
bidding strategy; energy; nash equilibrium; spinning reserve; supply function equilibrium (SFE);
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907389
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This study concentrates on the strategic interaction among suppliers in a centralized market where electrical energy and spinning reserve are simultaneously traded. A bilevel optimization technique and a mathematical program with equilibrium constraints approach are utilized to develop optimal bidding strategy for competitive suppliers participating in these markets. The strategic behavior of each supplier is represented via a parameterized Supply Function Equilibria (SFE) model. Two versions of the parameterized SFE are considered. They are referred to as c-parameterization model (involving manipulation of the sole intercept) and (s, c) -parameterization model (involving arbitrarily manipulation of the slope and the intercept). A pay-as-bid pricing mechanism is assumed for settling the market and calculating the supplier profit from selling energy and spinning reserve services. A six-bus test system together with a number of case studies are used to illustrate the interaction between the energy and spinning reserve markets. Transmission limits and the supplier physical constraints are observed in this study. The extension of the method to include a multiperiod market with intertemporal constraints is discussed through numerical results.
引用
收藏
页码:2074 / 2085
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IEEE T POWER SYSTEMS
[2]   Optimal response of a power generator to energy, AGC, and reserve pool-based markets [J].
Arroyo, JM ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (02) :404-410
[3]   Transmission analysis by Nash game method [J].
Bai, XM ;
Shahidehpour, SM ;
Ramesh, VC ;
Yu, EK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1997, 12 (03) :1046-1051
[4]   Electricity market equilibrium models: The effect of parametrization [J].
Baldick, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (04) :1170-1176
[5]   An oligopolistic model of an integrated market for energy and spinning reserve [J].
Bautista, G ;
Quintana, VH ;
Aguado, JA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2006, 21 (01) :132-142
[6]  
Berry C. A., 1999, Utilities Policy, V8, P139, DOI 10.1016/S0957-1787(99)00016-8
[7]   Network constraint impacts on the competitive electricity markets under supply-side strategic bidding [J].
Bompard, E ;
Lu, W ;
Napoli, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2006, 21 (01) :160-170
[8]   Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks [J].
Cardell, JB ;
Hitt, CC ;
Hogan, WW .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1997, 19 (1-2) :109-137
[9]   Energy and ancillary service dispatch for the interim ISO New England Electricity Market [J].
Cheung, KW ;
Shamsollahi, P ;
Sun, D ;
Milligan, J ;
Potishnak, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (03) :968-974
[10]   Searching for noncooperative equilibria in centralized electricity markets [J].
Correia, PF ;
Overbye, TJ ;
Hiskens, IA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (04) :1417-1424