Adjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:542
作者
Horgan, Anne M. [2 ]
Amir, Eitan
Walter, Thomas
Knox, Jennifer J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Div Med Oncol & Hematol, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Waterford Reg Hosp, Waterford, Ireland
关键词
HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; GALLBLADDER CARCINOMA; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADICAL RESECTION; BILE-DUCT; CHEMOTHERAPY; CHEMORADIATION; GEMCITABINE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2011.40.5381
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) is unclear, with conflicting results from nonrandomized studies. We report a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the impact of AT on survival. Methods Studies published between 1960 and November 2010, which evaluated adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), or both (CRT) compared with curative-intent surgery alone for resected BTC were included. Only tumors of the gallbladder and bile ducts were assessed. Published data were extracted and computed into odds ratios (ORs) for death at 5 years. Subgroup analyses of benefit based on lymph node (LN) or resection margin positivity (R1) were prespecified. Data were weighted by generic inverse variance and pooled using random-effect modeling. Results Twenty studies involving 6,712 patients were analyzed. There was a nonsignificant improvement in overall survival with any AT compared with surgery alone (pooled OR, 0.74; P = .06). There was no difference between gallbladder and bile duct tumors (P = .68). The association was significant when the two registry analyses were excluded. Those receiving CT or CRT derived statistically greater benefit than RT alone (OR, 0.39, 0.61, and 0.98, respectively; P = .02). The greatest benefit for AT was in those with LN-positive disease (OR, 0.49; P = .004) and R1 disease (OR, 0.36; P = .002). Conclusion This analysis supports AT for BTC. Prospective randomized trials are needed to provide better rationale for this commonly used strategy. On the basis of our data, such trials could involve two active comparators rather than a no-treatment arm among patients with LN-positive or R1 disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1934 / 1940
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma [J].
Anderson, CD ;
Pinson, CW ;
Berlin, J ;
Chari, RS .
ONCOLOGIST, 2004, 9 (01) :43-57
[2]  
[Anonymous], ANN SURG
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM J SURG
[4]  
[Anonymous], J GASTROINTEST SURG
[5]  
[Anonymous], SEER CANC STAT REV 1
[6]   Major hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma type 3 and 4: Prognostic factors and longterm outcomes [J].
Baton, Olivier ;
Azoulay, Daniel ;
Adam, Delvart V. Rene ;
Castaing, Denis .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (02) :250-260
[7]  
Chapman WC, 2001, AM SURGEON, V67, P843
[8]   Medical progress - Biliary tract cancers [J].
de Groen, PC ;
Gores, GJ ;
LaRusso, NF ;
Gunderson, LL ;
Nagorney, DM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (18) :1368-1378
[9]  
Deeks J.J., 2006, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, V4, P97
[10]   Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening [J].
Deeks, JJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7305) :157-162