Qualification of a quantitative laryngeal imaging system using videostroboscopy and videokymography

被引:25
作者
Popolo, Peter S. [1 ]
Titze, Ingo R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Denver Ctr Performing Arts, Natl Ctr Voice & Speech, Denver, CO 80204 USA
关键词
endoscope; glottal width; laser; videokymography; videostroboscopy; vocal fold;
D O I
10.1177/000348940811700602
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: We sought to determine whether full-cycle glottal width measurements could be obtained with a quantitative laryngeal imaging system using videostroboscopy, and whether glottal width and vocal fold length measurements were repeatable and reliable. Methods: Synthetic vocal folds were phonated on a laboratory bench, and dynamic images were obtained in repeated trials by use of videostroboscopy and videokymography (VKG) with an imaging system equipped with a 2-point laser projection device for measuring absolute dimensions. Video images were also obtained with an industrial videoscope system with a built-in laser measurement capability. Maximum glottal width and vocal fold length were compared among these 3 methods. Results: The average variation in maximum glottal width measurements between stroboscopic data and VKG data was 3.10%. The average variations in width measurements between the clinical system and the industrial system were 1.93% (stroboscopy) and 3.49% (VKG). The variations in vocal fold length were similarly small. The standard deviations across trials were 0.29 mm for width and 0.48 mm for length (stroboscopy), 0.18 mm for width (VKG), and 0.25 mm for width and 0.84 mm for length (industrial). Conclusions: For stable, periodic vibration, the full extent of the glottal width can be reliably measured with the quantitative videostroboscopy system.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 412
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Bless D M, 1987, Ear Nose Throat J, V66, P289
  • [2] Comparison of a flexible laryngoscope with calibrated sizing function to intraoperative measurements
    Kobler, James B.
    Rosen, David I.
    Burns, James A.
    Akst, Lee M.
    Broadhurst, Matthew S.
    Zeitels, Steven M.
    Hillman, Robert E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 115 (10) : 733 - 740
  • [3] Assessment of vocal function using simultaneous aerodynamic and calibrated videostroboscopic measures
    Kobler, JB
    Hillman, RE
    Zeitels, SM
    Kuo, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1998, 107 (06) : 477 - 485
  • [4] Larsson Hans, 2004, Logoped Phoniatr Vocol, V29, P154, DOI 10.1080/14015430410024353
  • [5] Nishizawa N., 1988, Physiology: Voice Production, Mechanisms, and Function, P75
  • [6] ROSEN D, 2003, P 6 INT WORKSH ADV Q
  • [7] Brief report - Laryngeal morphometry with a new laser 'clip on' device
    Schade, G
    Leuwer, R
    Kraas, M
    Rassow, B
    Hess, MM
    [J]. LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2004, 34 (05) : 363 - 367
  • [8] High-precision measurement of the vocal fold length and vibratory amplitudes
    Schuberth, S
    Hoppe, U
    Döllinger, M
    Lohscheller, J
    Eysholdt, U
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2002, 112 (06) : 1043 - 1049
  • [9] Videokymography: High-speed line scanning of vocal fold vibration
    Svec, JG
    Schutte, HK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 1996, 10 (02) : 201 - 205
  • [10] Aerodynamic transfer of energy to the vocal folds
    Thomson, SL
    Mongeau, L
    Frankel, SH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 118 (03) : 1689 - 1700