Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling

被引:1304
作者
Peterson, A. Townsend [1 ,2 ]
Papes, Monica [1 ,2 ]
Soberon, Jorge [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Nat Hist Museum, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Biodivers Res Ctr, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
ecological niche model; model evaluation; receiver operating characteristic; area under curve; omission error;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) has become a dominant tool in evaluating the accuracy of models predicting distributions of species. ROC has the advantage of being threshold-independent, and as such does not require decisions regarding thresholds of what constitutes a prediction of presence versus a prediction of absence. However, we show that, comparing two ROCS, using the AUC systematically undervalues models that do not provide predictions across the entire spectrum of proportional areas in the study area. Current ROC approaches in ecological niche modeling applications are also inappropriate because the two error components are weighted equally. We recommend a modification of ROC that remedies these problems, using partial-area ROC approaches to provide a firmer foundation for evaluation of predictions from ecological niche models. A worked example demonstrates that models that are evaluated favorably by traditional ROC AUCs are not necessarily the best when niche modeling considerations are incorporated into the design of the test. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 72
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice [J].
Anderson, RP ;
Peterson, AT ;
Gómez-Laverde, M .
OIKOS, 2002, 98 (01) :3-16
[2]   Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models [J].
Anderson, RP ;
Lew, D ;
Peterson, AT .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2003, 162 (03) :211-232
[3]   Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Whittaker, RJ ;
Ladle, RJ ;
Erhard, M .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2005, 14 (06) :529-538
[4]   Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Pearson, RG ;
Thuiller, W ;
Erhard, M .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2005, 11 (09) :1504-1513
[5]   Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Guisan, Antoine .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2006, 33 (10) :1677-1688
[6]  
Burden R.L., 2005, Numerical methods for fuzzy system of linear equations
[7]   DOMAIN - A FLEXIBLE MODELING PROCEDURE FOR MAPPING POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PLANTS AND ANIMALS [J].
CARPENTER, G ;
GILLISON, AN ;
WINTER, J .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1993, 2 (06) :667-680
[8]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[9]   Partial AUC estimation and regression [J].
Dodd, LE ;
Pepe, MS .
BIOMETRICS, 2003, 59 (03) :614-623
[10]   Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data [J].
Elith, J ;
Graham, CH ;
Anderson, RP ;
Dudík, M ;
Ferrier, S ;
Guisan, A ;
Hijmans, RJ ;
Huettmann, F ;
Leathwick, JR ;
Lehmann, A ;
Li, J ;
Lohmann, LG ;
Loiselle, BA ;
Manion, G ;
Moritz, C ;
Nakamura, M ;
Nakazawa, Y ;
Overton, JM ;
Peterson, AT ;
Phillips, SJ ;
Richardson, K ;
Scachetti-Pereira, R ;
Schapire, RE ;
Soberón, J ;
Williams, S ;
Wisz, MS ;
Zimmermann, NE .
ECOGRAPHY, 2006, 29 (02) :129-151