The Accuracy of Digital Radiography in Orthopaedic Applications

被引:30
作者
Fowler, John R. [1 ]
Ilyas, Asif M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Orthopaed, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
关键词
CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY; INTRAARTICULAR FRACTURES; CANAL LENGTH; RADIUS; ACETABULUM; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-010-1628-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent advances in technology and the use of image archiving and communication systems (PACS) has led some institutions to abandon conventional plain film radiography and rely solely on digital computed radiography. The level of accuracy of digital radiography in measuring distances for orthopaedic applications is unclear. Is it possible to accurately measure small distances using digital radiographs and PACS software? A model for measuring articular step-off was created using a commercially produced radiographic phantom with predetermined markings at known distances. Radiographs were taken using both indirect and direct computed radiography systems, then uploaded to a PACS system. Eighteen observers measured the distance between standardized, preselected points on the radiographic phantom. The measured values were compared with the known values for each measurement. The mean measured values differed by 0 and 0.1 mm (SD, 0.5 mm) for indirect and direct radiographs, respectively, when measuring short distances and 1.4 mm and 2.6 mm (SD, 1.0 mm) for indirect and direct radiographs, respectively, when measuring longer distances. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interobserver reliability was 0.82 for indirect and 0.75 for direct digital radiography. The ICC for intraobserver reliability was 0.94 for indirect and 0.90 for direct digital radiography. Although the mean measured values were very accurate (within 0.1 mm for a known distance of 3.2 mm), the SD of measurements (0.5 mm) could affect the interpretation of data, especially in clinical situations such as evaluating the quality of fracture reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:1781 / 1784
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BLOKKER CP, 1984, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P193
[2]   Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals [J].
Burger, CL ;
Mork, TO ;
Hutter, JW ;
Nicoll, B .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1999, 25 (04) :260-263
[3]  
Cole RJ, 1997, J HAND SURG-AM, V22A, P792
[4]  
DECOSTER TA, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P196
[5]   Evaluation of a digital radiography to estimate working length [J].
Garcia, AA ;
Navarro, LF ;
Castello, VU ;
Laliga, RM .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1997, 23 (06) :363-365
[6]   Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging:: Diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study [J].
Garmer, M ;
Hennigs, SP ;
Jäger, HJ ;
Schrick, F ;
van de Loo, T ;
Jacobs, A ;
Hanusch, A ;
Christmann, A ;
Mathias, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (01) :75-80
[7]   RADIOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF CANAL LENGTH - DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
HEDRICK, RT ;
DOVE, SB ;
PETERS, DD ;
MCDAVID, WD .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1994, 20 (07) :320-326
[8]   INTRAARTICULAR FRACTURES OF THE DISTAL END OF THE RADIUS IN YOUNG-ADULTS [J].
KNIRK, JL ;
JUPITER, JB .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1986, 68A (05) :647-659
[9]   Articular fractures: Does an anatomic reduction really change the result? [J].
Marsh, JL ;
Buckwalter, J ;
Gelberman, R ;
Dirschl, D ;
Olson, S ;
Brown, T ;
Llinias, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (07) :1259-1271
[10]  
MATTA JM, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P230