Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions

被引:44
作者
Bougioukas, Konstantinos I. [1 ]
Bouras, Emmanouil [1 ]
Apostolidou-Kiouti, Fani [1 ]
Kokkali, Stamatia [1 ]
Arvanitidou, Malamatenia [1 ]
Haidich, Anna-Bettina [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hyg Social Prevent Med & Med Stat, Univ Campus, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Abstract; Checklist; Overview of systematic reviews; PRIO for abstracts; PRIO-Harms; Reporting guidelines; HARMS; RISK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: An overview of systematic reviews (OoSRs) is a study designed to offer a broad view of evidence from existing systematic reviews (SRs). The abstract is an important part of an OoSRs as it can determine whether reading the full text is of interest. The aim of this article is to offer guidelines to promote transparent and sufficient reporting in abstracts of OoSRs of health care interventions. Study Design and Setting: The items were developed by combining key features from abstracts of OoSRs, PRISMA for abstracts, and our published reporting guidelines for OoSRs. The initial version was distributed to experts to give feedback; pilot testing by a group of researchers followed. The refined checklist was applied by two reviewers independently in a sample of 40 abstracts. Results: The developed instrument "Preferred Reporting Items for OoSRs abstracts" (PRIO for abstracts) consists of six sections with 15 topics including 20 items in total. The mean inter-rater reliability was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.82, 0.92). An explanation and at least one published example of good reporting per item are provided. Conclusion: This instrument will assist authors in writing transparent and informative abstracts for OoSRs and can be adopted by journals that publish OoSRs. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 79
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [31] Up-to-dateness of reviews is often neglected in overviews: a systematic review
    Pieper, Dawid
    Antoine, Sunya-Lee
    Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
    Eikermann, Michaela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (12) : 1302 - 1308
  • [32] Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview
    Pieper, Dawid
    Antoine, Sunya-Lee
    Mathes, Tim
    Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
    Eikermann, Michaela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) : 368 - 375
  • [33] Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review
    Pieper, Dawid
    Buechter, Roland
    Jerinic, Petra
    Eikermann, Michaela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (12) : 1267 - 1273
  • [34] Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews
    Pollock, Alex
    Campbell, Pauline
    Brunton, Ginny
    Hunt, Harriet
    Estcourt, Lise
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [35] Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
    Pollock, Michelle
    Fernandes, Ricardo M.
    Hartling, Lisa
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17 : 48
  • [36] If there is only one author or only one database was searched, a study should not be called a systematic review COMMENT
    Puljak, Livia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 91 : 4 - 5
  • [37] Mastering the Art of Abstracts
    Riordan, Laura
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2015, 115 (01): : 41 - +
  • [38] AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
    Shea, Beverley J.
    Reeves, Barnaby C.
    Wells, George
    Thuku, Micere
    Hamel, Candyce
    Moran, Julian
    Moher, David
    Tugwell, Peter
    Welch, Vivian
    Kristjansson, Elizabeth
    Henry, David A.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 358
  • [39] Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies
    Siontis, Konstantinos C.
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
  • [40] Tonkin-Crine SK., 2017, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V9, pCD012252, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD012252, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD012252]