A cross-sectional survey to investigate the quality of care in Tuscan (Italy) nursing homes: the structural, process and outcome indicators of nutritional care

被引:12
作者
Bonaccorsi, Guglielmo [1 ]
Collini, Francesca [2 ]
Castagnoli, Mariangela [2 ]
Di Bari, Mauro [3 ,4 ]
Cavallini, Maria Chiara [3 ,4 ]
Zaffarana, Nicoletta [3 ]
Pepe, Pasquale [2 ]
Mugelli, Alessandro [5 ]
Lucenteforte, Ersilia [5 ]
Vannacci, Alfredo [5 ]
Lorini, Chiara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Hlth Sci, I-50134 Florence, Italy
[2] Reg Hlth Agcy Tuscany, Tuscany, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, Res Unit Med Aging, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Unit Geriatr Cardiol & Med, Florence, Italy
[4] Azienda Osped Univ Careggi, Dept Heart & Vessels, Florence, Italy
[5] Univ Florence, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Childrens Hlth, I-50139 Florence, Italy
关键词
Quality indicators; Nutritional care; Nursing home; Multilevel analysis; Case mix; Risk factors; MINIMUM DATA SET; INFLUENCE MALNUTRITION PREVALENCE; BODY-MASS INDEX; SCREENING TOOL; WEIGHT-LOSS; VALIDITY; ADJUSTMENT; SYSTEMS; GERMAN; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-015-0881-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Previous studies have investigated process and structure indicators of nutritional care as well as their use in nursing homes (NHs), but the relative weight of these indicators in predicting the risk of malnutrition remains unclear. Aims of the present study are to describe the quality indicators of nutritional care in older residents in a sample of NHs in Tuscany, Italy, and to evaluate the predictors of protein-energy malnutrition risk. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 67 NHs. Information was collected to evaluate quality indicators of nutritional care and the individual risk factors for malnutrition, which was assessed using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool. A multilevel model was used to analyse the association between risk and predictors. Results: Out of 2395 participants, 23.7 % were at high, 11 % at medium, and 65.3 % at low risk for malnutrition. Forty-two percent of the NHs had only a personal scale to weigh residents; 88 % did not routinely use a screening test/tool for malnutrition; 60 % used some standardized approach for weight measurement; 43 % did not assess the severity of dysphagia; 12 % were not staffed with dietitians. Patients living in NHs where a chair or platform scale was available had a significantly lower risk of malnutrition (OR = 0.73; 95 % CI = 0.56-0.94). None of the other structural or process quality indicators showed a statistically significant association with malnutrition risk. Conclusions: Of all the process and structural indicators considered, only the absence of an adequate scale to weigh residents predicted the risk of malnutrition, after adjusting for case mix. These findings prompt the conduction of further investigations on the effectiveness of structural and process indicators that are used to describe quality of nutritional care in NHs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] What Can We Learn From Quality Improvement Research? A Critical Review of Research Methods
    Alexander, Jeffrey A.
    Hearld, Larry R.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2009, 66 (03) : 235 - 271
  • [2] Anderson RA, 1999, RES NURS HEALTH, V22, P271, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199908)22:4<271::AID-NUR2>3.3.CO
  • [3] 2-Y
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, DEF LIV ESS ASS
  • [5] [Anonymous], PROG MIN MON DELL QU
  • [6] [Anonymous], MUST EXPL BOOKL
  • [7] [Anonymous], REP REC REC ACT
  • [8] [Anonymous], MAN RIF STAND ANTR
  • [9] [Anonymous], REP FIN
  • [10] [Anonymous], QUAL EQ SIC RSA