Evaluation of protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in seasonal calving pasture-based dairy production systems

被引:37
|
作者
Herlihy, M. M. [1 ,2 ]
Berry, D. P. [1 ]
Crowe, M. A. [2 ]
Diskin, M. G. [3 ]
Butler, S. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Fermoy Co, Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Agr Food Sci & Vet Med, Dublin 4, Ireland
[3] TEAGASC, Athenry Co, Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Galway, Ireland
关键词
estrous synchronization; Ovsynch; dairy cow; seasonal calving; TIMED ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION; HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN COWS; REPRODUCTIVE MANAGEMENT; OVSYNCH PROTOCOL; BODY CONDITION; PREGNANCY RATE; MILK-YIELD; PERFORMANCE; CATTLE; GNRH;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2010-4126
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Lactating dairy cows (n = 1,538) were enrolled in a randomized complete block design study to evaluate protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation. Within each herd (n = 8), cows were divided into 3 calving groups: early; mid; and late; based on days in milk (DIM) at mating start date (MSD). Early calving cows (n = 1,244) were >= 42 DIM at MSD, mid-calving cows (n = 179) were 21 to 41 DIM at MSD, and latecalving cows (n = 115) were 0 to 20 DIM at MSD. Cows in the early, mid-, and late-calving groups were synchronized to facilitate estrus or timed AT (TAI) at MSD (planned breeding 1; PB1), 21 d (PB2), and 42 d (PB3) after MSD, respectively. For each PB, cows in the relevant calving group were stratified by parity and calving date and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental groups: (1) d - 10 GnRH (10 mu g of i.m. buserelin) and controlled internal drug release insert (CIDR; 1.38 g of progesterone); d -3 PGF(2 alpha) (25 mg of i.m. dinoprost); and d 2 CIDR out and AT at observed estrus (CIDR_OBS); (2) same as CIDR_OBS, but GnRH 36 h after CIDR out and TAI 18 h later (CIDR_TAI); (3) same as CIDR_TAI, but no CIDR (Ovsynch); or (4) untreated controls (CTRL). The CIDR_OBS, CIDR TAI, and Ovsynch had shorter mean intervals from calving to first service compared with the CTRL (69.2; 63.4, and 63.7 vs. 73.7 d, respectively). Both CIDR_OBS (predicted probability; PP of pregnancy = 0.59) and CIDR_TAI (PP of pregnancy = 0.54) had increased odds of conceiving at first service compared with Ovsynch [PP of pregnancy = 0.45; odds ratio (OR) = 1.81 and OR = 1.46, respectively], and Ovsynch had decreased likelihood of conceiving at first service (OR = 0.70) compared with CTRL (PP of pregnancy = 0.53). Both CIDR_TAI {hazard ratio; HR [95% confidence interval = 1.21 (1.04, 1.41)]} and Ovsynch [HR (95% confidence interval) = 1.23 (1.05, 1.44)] were associated with an increased likelihood of earlier conception compared with the CTRL. A greater proportion of cows on the CIDR_TAI treatment successfully established pregnancy in the first 42 d of the breeding season compared with the CTRL (0.75 vs. 0.67 PP of 42-d pregnancy, respectively). Protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation were effective at achieving earlier first service and conception in pasture-based seasonal calving dairy herds. However; animals that conceived following insemination at observed estrus had a decreased likelihood of embryo loss to first service compared with animals bred with TAI (PP of embryo loss after first service = 0.05 vs. 0.09; OR = 0.52).
引用
收藏
页码:4488 / 4501
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of short-term progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in postpartum beef cows
    Wilson, D. J.
    Mallory, D. A.
    Busch, D. C.
    Leitman, N. R.
    Haden, J. K.
    Schafer, D. J.
    Ellersieck, M. R.
    Smith, M. F.
    Patterson, D. J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 88 (06) : 2045 - 2054
  • [32] Evaluation of solar photovoltaic systems to shade cows in a pasture-based dairy herd
    Sharpe, K. T.
    Heins, B. J.
    Buchanan, E. S.
    Reese, M. H.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (03) : 2794 - 2806
  • [33] A quantitative case study assessment of biophysical and economic effects from altering season of calving in temperate pasture-based dairy systems
    Spaans, O. K.
    Macdonald, K. A.
    Neal, M.
    Auldist, M. J.
    Lancaster, J. A. S.
    Bryant, A. M.
    Doole, G. J.
    Roche, J. R.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (12) : 11523 - 11535
  • [34] Implementation of compact calving at the farm level: A qualitative analysis of farmers operating pasture-based dairy systems in Ireland
    Mulkerrins, M.
    Beecher, M.
    McAloon, C. G.
    Macken-Walsh, A.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (07) : 5822 - 5835
  • [35] Economic assessment of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows of divergent Economic Breeding Index evaluated under seasonal calving pasture-based management
    O'Sullivan, M.
    Shalloo, L.
    Pierce, K. M.
    Buckley, F.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (11) : 10311 - 10320
  • [36] Nutritional management to optimize fertility of dairy cows in pasture-based systems
    Butler, S. T.
    ANIMAL, 2014, 8 : 15 - 26
  • [37] Risk factors associated with the welfare of grazing dairy cows in spring-calving, hybrid pasture-based systems
    Crossley, R. E.
    Bokkers, E. A. M.
    Browne, N.
    Kennedy, E.
    Engel, B.
    Conneely, M.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2022, 204
  • [38] Factors associated with the financial performance of spring-calving, pasture-based dairy farms
    Ramsbottom, G.
    Horan, B.
    Berry, D. P.
    Roche, J. R.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (05) : 3526 - 3540
  • [39] Which cow for pasture-based production systems?
    Piccand, Valerie
    Cutullic, Erwan
    Schori, Fredy
    Weilenmann, Sara
    Thomet, Peter
    AGRARFORSCHUNG SCHWEIZ, 2011, 2 (06): : 252 - 257
  • [40] Activity level of grazing dairy cows, as a criterion for grazing management in pasture-based dairy production systems
    Pina, Luis F.
    Balocchi, Oscar A.
    Gonzalez-Verdugo, Humberto
    Keim, Juan P.
    Pulido, Ruben
    Rosas, Felipe
    Araya, Cristobal
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (04): : 458 - 470