On the axiomatic foundation of carbon and energy footprints

被引:3
作者
Kuhn, Thomas [1 ]
Pestow, Radomir [1 ]
Zenker, Anja [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Chemnitz, Dept Econ, Chemnitz, Germany
关键词
Ecological footprint indices; Axiomatic foundation; Sustainability indicators; Sustainable welfare; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; METHODOLOGY; IMPACT; IPAT;
D O I
10.1186/s13705-020-00254-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background A wide variety of footprint concepts is proposed in the scientific literature giving rise to a selection problem. Method The objective of this paper is to provide an axiomatic foundation to the concept of ecological footprint indices, in particular carbon and energy footprints. For this purpose, we define five axioms representing general properties which any ecological footprint measure should fulfill. Results It can be shown that there exists a unique index which is characterized by the given set of axioms. Its functional form is determined, and an economic interpretation is given. The most prominent empirical application is discussed. Conclusion We find that the proposed index as a generalization of more specific indices like carbon and energy footprint indices may confirm some important issues discussed in the literature. First, it incorporates a trade component indicating the ecological footprint of economic activities embodied in the trade pattern of a country or region. Moreover, the productivity of land use in production as a means to mitigate the pressure on the ecological system is reflected. But, most importantly, from a methodological point of view, there is no longer the need for designing ecological footprint indices ad hoc, in particular for the sake of empirical application.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Axiomatic characterization of the Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve orderings [J].
Aaberge, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2001, 101 (01) :115-132
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Environmental accounting: EMERGY and environmental decision making
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1971, ENV POWER SOC
[5]  
[Anonymous], ENV DEV SUSTAIN, V1, P149
[6]   A DIFFICULTY IN THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL WELFARE [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1950, 58 (04) :328-346
[7]  
Arrow KJ, 1951, SOCIAL CHOICE INDIVI
[8]   New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy [J].
Bicknell, KB ;
Ball, RJ ;
Cullen, R ;
Bigsby, HR .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 27 (02) :149-160
[9]  
Book Wackernagel M., 1998, OUR ECOLOGICAL FOOTP
[10]   Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts' underlying methodology and framework [J].
Borucke, Michael ;
Moore, David ;
Cranston, Gemma ;
Gracey, Kyle ;
Iha, Katsunori ;
Larson, Joy ;
Lazarus, Elias ;
Morales, Juan Carlos ;
Wackernagel, Mathis ;
Galli, Alessandro .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 24 :518-533