Evidence-based interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A systematic review

被引:9
|
作者
Veldhuizen, J. D. [1 ,5 ]
Hafsteinsdottir, T. B. [1 ,2 ]
Mikkers, M. C. [3 ,4 ]
Bleijenberg, N. [1 ,2 ]
Schuurmans, M. J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Utrecht, Fac Hlth Care, Res Ctr Hlth & Sustainable Living, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Div Julius, Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Healthcare Author NZa, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Tilburg Sch Econ & Management, Dept Econ, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Postbus 1201, NL-3501 AA Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
Community health nursing; District nursing; Evidence-based nursing; Health care outcome assessment; Systematic review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PREVENTIVE HOME VISITS; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH-PROMOTION; PROGRAM; MANAGEMENT; RISK; MOBILITY; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100053
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Measuring nursing interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in a standardized manner is essential because it provides insight into the quality of delivered care. However, there is currently no systematic overview of the interventions conducted by district nurses, the evidence for the effects of these interventions, or what nurse-sensitive outcomes should be measured. Objective: 1) To provide an overview of interventions for community-living older people evaluated in district nursing care and evidence for the effects of these interventions and 2) to identify the nurse-sensitive outcomes that are used to evaluate these district nursing care interventions, how these outcomes are measured, and in which patient groups they are applied. Design: A systematic review of the literature. Setting: District nursing care. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and EMBASE. Methods: Only experimental studies evaluating district nursing care interventions for communkity-living older people were included. A data extraction form was developed to extract the study characteristics and evaluate interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes. The methodological quality of the included studies was reviewed using the 13-item critical appraisal tool for randomized controlled trials by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: A total of 22 studies were included. The methodological quality of the studies varied, with scores ranging from 6 to 11 on a scale of 0-13. The 22 interventions identified were heterogeneous with respect to intervention components, intervention delivery, and target population. The 44 outcomes identified were grouped into categories following the Nursing Outcome Classification and were measured in various ways and at various times. Conclusion: This is the first systematic review summarizing the evidence for the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions conducted by district nurses on community-living older people. It is unclear what interventions are effective and what outcomes should be used to substantiate district nursing care effectiveness. Because only studies with experimental designs were included, this analysis may provide an incomplete assessment of the effectiveness of interventions in district nursing care. Therefore, it is highly necessary to produce methodologically strong evidence through research programs focusing on district nursing care.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evidence-Based Nurse-Driven Interventions for the Care of Newborns With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
    Casper, Tammy
    Arbour, Megan
    ADVANCES IN NEONATAL CARE, 2014, 14 (06) : 376 - 380
  • [42] Nurse-led educational interventions on cancer pain outcomes for oncology outpatients: a systematic review
    Zhou, L.
    Liu, X-L
    Tan, J-Y
    Yu, H-P
    Pratt, J.
    Peng, Y-Q
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2015, 62 (02) : 218 - 230
  • [43] A systematic review of adaptations of evidence-based public health interventions globally
    Escoffery, Cam
    Lebow-Skelley, E.
    Haardoerfer, R.
    Boing, E.
    Udelson, H.
    Wood, R.
    Hartman, M.
    Fernandez, M. E.
    Mullen, P. D.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13 : 125
  • [45] Evidence-Based Practice in physiotherapy: a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions
    Scurlock-Evans, Laura
    Upton, Penney
    Upton, Dominic
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2014, 100 (03) : 208 - 219
  • [46] Addressing Health Care Workers' Mental Health: A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Interventions and Current Resources
    Anger, W. Kent
    Dimoff, Jennifer K.
    Alley, Lindsey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 114 : S213 - S226
  • [47] A need for implementation science to optimise the use of evidence-based interventions in HIV care: A systematic literature review
    Cox, Joseph
    Gutner, Cassidy
    Kronfli, Nadine
    Lawson, Anna
    Robbins, Michele
    Nientker, Lisette
    Ostawal, Amrita
    Barber, Tristan
    Croce, Davide
    Hardy, David
    Jessen, Heiko
    Katlama, Christine
    Mallolas, Josep
    Rizzardini, Giuliano
    Alcorn, Keith
    Wohlfeiler, Michael
    Le Fevre, Eric
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (08):
  • [48] Effective nursing interventions in ADL care affecting independence and comfort- a systematic review
    Cremer, S.
    Vluggen, S.
    de Man-Van-Ginkel, J. M.
    Metzelthin, S. F.
    Zwakhalen, S. M.
    Bleijlevens, M. H. C.
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2023, 52 : 73 - 90
  • [49] Optimizing patients' functional status during daily nursing care interventions: A systematic review
    Verstraten, Carolien C. J. M. M.
    Metzelthin, Silke F.
    Schoonhoven, Lisette
    Schuurmans, Marieke J.
    de Man-van Ginkel, Janneke M.
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2020, 43 (05) : 478 - 488
  • [50] Palliative care in South Asia: a systematic review of the evidence for care models, interventions, and outcomes
    Taranjit Singh
    Richard Harding
    BMC Research Notes, 8 (1)