Evidence-based interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A systematic review

被引:9
|
作者
Veldhuizen, J. D. [1 ,5 ]
Hafsteinsdottir, T. B. [1 ,2 ]
Mikkers, M. C. [3 ,4 ]
Bleijenberg, N. [1 ,2 ]
Schuurmans, M. J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Utrecht, Fac Hlth Care, Res Ctr Hlth & Sustainable Living, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Div Julius, Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Healthcare Author NZa, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Tilburg Sch Econ & Management, Dept Econ, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Postbus 1201, NL-3501 AA Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
Community health nursing; District nursing; Evidence-based nursing; Health care outcome assessment; Systematic review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PREVENTIVE HOME VISITS; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH-PROMOTION; PROGRAM; MANAGEMENT; RISK; MOBILITY; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100053
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Measuring nursing interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in a standardized manner is essential because it provides insight into the quality of delivered care. However, there is currently no systematic overview of the interventions conducted by district nurses, the evidence for the effects of these interventions, or what nurse-sensitive outcomes should be measured. Objective: 1) To provide an overview of interventions for community-living older people evaluated in district nursing care and evidence for the effects of these interventions and 2) to identify the nurse-sensitive outcomes that are used to evaluate these district nursing care interventions, how these outcomes are measured, and in which patient groups they are applied. Design: A systematic review of the literature. Setting: District nursing care. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and EMBASE. Methods: Only experimental studies evaluating district nursing care interventions for communkity-living older people were included. A data extraction form was developed to extract the study characteristics and evaluate interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes. The methodological quality of the included studies was reviewed using the 13-item critical appraisal tool for randomized controlled trials by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: A total of 22 studies were included. The methodological quality of the studies varied, with scores ranging from 6 to 11 on a scale of 0-13. The 22 interventions identified were heterogeneous with respect to intervention components, intervention delivery, and target population. The 44 outcomes identified were grouped into categories following the Nursing Outcome Classification and were measured in various ways and at various times. Conclusion: This is the first systematic review summarizing the evidence for the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions conducted by district nurses on community-living older people. It is unclear what interventions are effective and what outcomes should be used to substantiate district nursing care effectiveness. Because only studies with experimental designs were included, this analysis may provide an incomplete assessment of the effectiveness of interventions in district nursing care. Therefore, it is highly necessary to produce methodologically strong evidence through research programs focusing on district nursing care.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dementia care education interventions on healthcare providers' outcomes in the nursing home setting: A systematic review
    Zhao, Yayi
    Liu, Li
    Chan, Helen Yue-lai
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2021, 44 (06) : 891 - 905
  • [32] Academic Detailing Interventions and Evidence-Based Prescribing A Systematic Review
    Rome, Benjamin N.
    Dancel, Ellen
    Chaitoff, Alexander
    Trombetta, Dominick
    Roy, Shuvro
    Fanikos, Paul
    Germain, Jayda
    Avorn, Jerry
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2025, 8 (01) : e2453684
  • [33] NURSE RESIDENCY PROGRAMS: AN EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW OF THEORY, PROCESS, AND OUTCOMES
    Anderson, Gwen
    Hair, Carole
    Todero, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2012, 28 (04) : 203 - 212
  • [34] Ambulatory Care Nurse-Sensitive Indicators: A Scoping Review of the Literature 2006-2021
    Siaki, Leilani A.
    Patrician, Patricia A.
    Loan, Lori A.
    Matlock, Ann Marie
    Start, Rachel E.
    Gardner, Cubby L.
    McCarthy, Mary S.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2023, 38 (01) : 76 - 81
  • [35] A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Cognitive and/or Behavioural Interventions Targeting Mental Health in LGBTQ+ Populations
    Tudor-Sfetea, Carina
    Topciu, Raluca
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN EUROPE, 2024, 6 (03):
  • [36] Evidence-based veterinary dermatology:: a systematic review of interventions for treatment of Pseudomonas otitis in dogs
    Nuttall, Tim
    Cole, Lynette K.
    VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 18 (02) : 69 - 77
  • [37] Identifying nurse-sensitive indicators for stand-alone high acuity areas: A systematic review
    Myers, Helen
    Pugh, Judith D.
    Twigg, Diane E.
    COLLEGIAN, 2018, 25 (04) : 447 - 456
  • [38] Effects of evidence-based nursing in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xue, Xiaolu
    Zhang, Lifang
    Zhen, Jiao
    Zeng, Xiaoxia
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2024, 76
  • [39] The association between nurse staffing and omissions in nursing care: A systematic review
    Griffiths, Peter
    Recio-Saucedo, Alejandra
    Dall'Ora, Chiara
    Briggs, Jim
    Maruotti, Antonello
    Meredith, Paul
    Smith, Gary B.
    Ball, Jane
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2018, 74 (07) : 1474 - 1487
  • [40] Adaptations of evidence-based trauma-focused interventions for children and adolescents: a systematic review
    Lange, Brittany C. L.
    Nelson, Ashley
    Lang, Jason M.
    Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 3 (01):