Evidence-based interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A systematic review

被引:8
|
作者
Veldhuizen, J. D. [1 ,5 ]
Hafsteinsdottir, T. B. [1 ,2 ]
Mikkers, M. C. [3 ,4 ]
Bleijenberg, N. [1 ,2 ]
Schuurmans, M. J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Utrecht, Fac Hlth Care, Res Ctr Hlth & Sustainable Living, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Div Julius, Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Healthcare Author NZa, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Tilburg Sch Econ & Management, Dept Econ, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Postbus 1201, NL-3501 AA Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
Community health nursing; District nursing; Evidence-based nursing; Health care outcome assessment; Systematic review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PREVENTIVE HOME VISITS; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH-PROMOTION; PROGRAM; MANAGEMENT; RISK; MOBILITY; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100053
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Measuring nursing interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in a standardized manner is essential because it provides insight into the quality of delivered care. However, there is currently no systematic overview of the interventions conducted by district nurses, the evidence for the effects of these interventions, or what nurse-sensitive outcomes should be measured. Objective: 1) To provide an overview of interventions for community-living older people evaluated in district nursing care and evidence for the effects of these interventions and 2) to identify the nurse-sensitive outcomes that are used to evaluate these district nursing care interventions, how these outcomes are measured, and in which patient groups they are applied. Design: A systematic review of the literature. Setting: District nursing care. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and EMBASE. Methods: Only experimental studies evaluating district nursing care interventions for communkity-living older people were included. A data extraction form was developed to extract the study characteristics and evaluate interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes. The methodological quality of the included studies was reviewed using the 13-item critical appraisal tool for randomized controlled trials by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: A total of 22 studies were included. The methodological quality of the studies varied, with scores ranging from 6 to 11 on a scale of 0-13. The 22 interventions identified were heterogeneous with respect to intervention components, intervention delivery, and target population. The 44 outcomes identified were grouped into categories following the Nursing Outcome Classification and were measured in various ways and at various times. Conclusion: This is the first systematic review summarizing the evidence for the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions conducted by district nurses on community-living older people. It is unclear what interventions are effective and what outcomes should be used to substantiate district nursing care effectiveness. Because only studies with experimental designs were included, this analysis may provide an incomplete assessment of the effectiveness of interventions in district nursing care. Therefore, it is highly necessary to produce methodologically strong evidence through research programs focusing on district nursing care.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in Dutch district nursing care: A survey study
    Veldhuizen, Jessica D.
    Schuurmans, Marieke J.
    Mikkers, Misja C.
    Bleijenberg, Nienke
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2022, 30 (06) : E5624 - E5636
  • [2] Interventions for compassionate nursing care: A systematic review
    Blomberg, Karin
    Griffiths, Peter
    Wengstrom, Yvonne
    May, Carl
    Bridges, Jackie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 62 : 137 - 155
  • [3] The effect of nurse-to-patient ratios on nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in acute specialist units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Driscoll, Andrea
    Grant, Maria J.
    Carroll, Diane
    Dalton, Sally
    Deaton, Christi
    Jones, Ian
    Lehwaldt, Daniela
    McKee, Gabrielle
    Munyombwe, Theresa
    Astin, Felicity
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2018, 17 (01) : 6 - 22
  • [4] Evidence-Based Evaluation of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Literature Review
    Enam, Amia
    Torres-Bonilla, Johanna
    Eriksson, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (11)
  • [5] Educational interventions on evidence-based nursing in clinical practice: A systematic review with qualitative analysis
    Haggman-Laitila, Arja
    Mattila, Lea-Riitta
    Melender, Hanna-Leena
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2016, 43 : 50 - 59
  • [6] Fundamental nursing care: A systematic review of the evidence on the effect of nursing care interventions for nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene
    Richards, David A.
    Hilli, Angelique
    Pentecost, Claire
    Goodwin, Victoria A.
    Frost, Julia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (11-12) : 2179 - 2188
  • [7] Integrated older people care and advanced practice nursing: an evidence-based review
    Prajankett, O.
    Markaki, A.
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2021, 68 (01) : 67 - 77
  • [9] Rationing of nursing care and nurse-patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative studies
    Papastavrou, Evridiki
    Andreou, Panayiota
    Efstathiou, Georgios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 29 (01): : 3 - 25
  • [10] Associations between hospital organizational features, person-centred care and nurse-sensitive outcomes for persons with dementia in acute care: A systematic literature review
    Casarez, Amber
    Smith, Jessica G.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (10) : 3915 - 3936