Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis

被引:31
|
作者
Gao, Chuan [1 ]
Xu, Gang [1 ]
Wang, Changyong [1 ]
Wang, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinling Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, 34 Yanggongjing, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy; Anastomotic leak; Diagnosis; Drainage amylase concentration; DRAIN AMYLASE; IVOR-LEWIS; OUTCOMES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1186/s13019-019-0864-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundMinimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy is an important surgical approach for esophageal cancer. Anastomotic leak is one of its common and serious complications. We assumed that the preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators would predict or detect anastomotic leak.MethodsBetween December 2016 and July 2017, patients underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy were identified and their preoperative variables and postoperative test indicators were recorded. Fisher's exact test, 2-tailed unpaired t test, nonparametric test and logistic regression were used to compare these datum between patients with or without anastomotic leak (AL). Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the best cut-off value of drainage amylase concentration for distinguishing anastomotic leak.ResultsIn all the 96 patients included, 12 patients were diagnosed as anastomotic leak by the esophagram. No differences in preoperative variables were observed between patients with and without AL. Patients in AL group appeared to have a lower prealbumin concentration in AL group on POD (postoperative day) 4(P=0.05), POD 5(P=0.04), POD 6 (P=0.06). Prealbumin concentration cutoff value of 128g/L on postoperative day 5 is 100.00% sensitive and 50.00% specific for predicting esophageal leaks. Drain amylases levels were higher in patients with anastomotic leak than those without anastomotic leak on POD 3(P=0.03), POD 4(P=0.01), POD 5(P<0.001), POD 6(P<0.001). The drain amylase cutoff value of 85IU/L on postoperative day 4 was 75.00% sensitive and 84.00% specific for detecting esophageal leaks; the cutoff value of 65IU/L on postoperative day 5 was 91.67% sensitive and 80.77% specific. The cutoff of 55/L on POD 6 is 100% sensitive and 86.96% specific.ConclusionDrainage amylase concentration on postoperative days may help to discover anastomotic leak in early stage after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. Prealbumin concentration below 128g/L on POD 5 might be potential risk factor for anastomotic leak.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis
    Chuan Gao
    Gang Xu
    Changyong Wang
    Dong Wang
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 14
  • [2] Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience
    Simitian, Grigor S.
    Hall, David J.
    Leverson, Glen
    Lushaj, Entela B.
    Lewis, Erik E.
    Musgrove, Kelsey A.
    McCarthy, Daniel P.
    Maloney, James D.
    SURGERY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 11 : 26 - 32
  • [3] Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group
    Zhu, Zi-yi
    Yong, Xu
    Luo, Rao-jun
    Wang, Yun-zhen
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2018, 19 (09): : 718 - 725
  • [4] Endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: a single-center's early experience
    Hayami, Masaru
    Klevebro, Fredrik
    Tsekrekos, Andrianos
    Winnberg, Johanna Samola
    Kamiya, Satoshi
    Rouvelas, Ioannis
    Nilsson, Magnus
    Lindblad, Mats
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2021, 34 (09)
  • [5] Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study
    Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
    Prager, Gerhard
    Langer, Felix B.
    Riegler, Franz M.
    Kabon, Barbara
    Fleischmann, Edith
    Zacherl, Johannes
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (12): : 3044 - 3053
  • [6] Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy (MIILE): A Single-Center Experience
    Wang, Jun
    Xu, Mei-qing
    Xie, Ming-ran
    Mei, Xin-yu
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 79 (04) : 319 - 325
  • [7] Risk factors for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for cancer: A NSQIP procedure-targeted analysis
    Hall, Bradley R.
    Flores, Aura E.
    Parshall, Zachary S.
    Shostrom, Valerie K.
    Are, Chandrakanth
    Reames, Bradley N.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 120 (04) : 661 - 669
  • [8] The anastomotic leak triad: preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative risk factors, and postoperative outcomes
    Cantrell, Michael Calvin
    Celso, Brian
    Mobley, Erin M.
    Pather, Keouna
    Alabbas, Haytham
    Awad, Ziad T.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 28 (10) : 1622 - 1628
  • [9] Analysis of the associated factors for severe weight loss after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy
    Wang, Peiyu
    Li, Yin
    Sun, Haibo
    Zhang, Ruixiang
    Liu, Xianben
    Liu, Shilei
    Wang, Zongfei
    Zheng, Yan
    Yu, Yongkui
    Chen, Xiankai
    Li, Haomiao
    Zhang, Jun
    Liu, Qi
    THORACIC CANCER, 2019, 10 (02) : 209 - 218
  • [10] Prognostic Factors for Recovery from Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy After Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Study
    Kuo, Chun-Ting
    Chiu, Chien-Hung
    Fang, Tuan-Jen
    Chao, Yin-Kai
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (03) : 1970 - 1979