Strategies and economics of farming systems with coffee in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome

被引:37
作者
de Souza, Helton Nonato [1 ]
de Graaff, Jan [2 ]
Pulleman, Mirjam M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Dept Soil Qual, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Land Degradat & Dev Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Family agriculture; Coffee agroforestry; Productivity; Profitability; Ecosystem services; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES;
D O I
10.1007/s10457-011-9452-x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the Zona da Mata of Minas Gerais State, Brazil, family farmers are adjusting to agroecological principles to reconcile sustainable agriculture, livelihood improvements and biodiversity conservation. Starting in 1993, experimentation with coffee agroforestry was gradually initiated on an increasing number of farms (37 in total), resulting in the simultaneous management of sun coffee (SC) and agroforestry coffee (AF) plots. We aimed (1) to identify factors that determine the farmers' selection of trees used in AF; (2) to describe the agroecological farms in transition; and (3) to perform an economic comparison between AF and SC. These objectives were addressed by combining data from botanical surveys in 1993/1994 and 2007, by interviews with farmers and by detailed data on the production value and costs of labour and material inputs. The results showed considerable diversity in farming strategies and management among the farmers. Early adopters of AF had diversified towards production of different marketable products. The use of native trees in AF for this purpose, and for restoration of soil fertility (e.g., leguminous trees), had increased since the start of the experiments, while exotic tree species were eliminated. Over a period of 12 years AF was more profitable than SC due to the production of a diversity of agricultural goods, despite somewhat higher establishment costs. Other ecosystem services delivered by AF, such as biodiversity and cultural services are currently not valorized. Payment schemes for environmental services could further improve the economic benefits of AF for family farmers and alleviate establishment and learning costs.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 242
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Agroforestry development: An environmental economic perspective [J].
Alavalapati, JRR ;
Shrestha, RK ;
Stainback, GA ;
Matta, JR .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2004, 61-2 (01) :299-310
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, DOI DOI 10.1119/1.2344558
[3]  
Bennett EM, 2007, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P191, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[191:TFOPSI]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
Bliska F.M.M., 2009, Informacoes Economicas, V39, P1
[6]  
BROWN S, 1989, FOREST SCI, V35, P881
[7]   Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: scientific challenges for a new agriculture [J].
Brussaard, Lijbert ;
Caron, Patrick ;
Campbell, Bruce ;
Lipper, Leslie ;
Mainka, Susan ;
Rabbinge, Rudy ;
Babin, Didier ;
Pulleman, Mirjam .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2010, 2 (1-2) :34-42
[8]  
Buck L.E., 2006, Understanding ecoagriculture: a framework for measuring landscape performance, P54
[9]   Distribution of mycorrhizal fungal spores in soils under agroforestry and monocultural coffee systems in Brazil [J].
Cardoso, IM ;
Boddington, C ;
Janssen, BH ;
Oenema, O ;
Kuyper, TW .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2003, 58 (01) :33-43
[10]   Continual learning for agroforestry system design: university, NGO and farmer partnership in Minas Gerais, Brazil [J].
Cardoso, IM ;
Guijt, I ;
Franco, FS ;
Carvalho, AF ;
Neto, PSF .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2001, 69 (03) :235-257