Is Two a Plural Marker in Early Child Language?

被引:9
作者
Barner, David [1 ]
Lui, Toni [2 ]
Zapf, Jennifer [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, Green Bay, WI 54302 USA
关键词
singular-plural; counting; number; semantic development; word learning; VERBAL COUNTING PRINCIPLES; NUMBER WORDS; MASS NOUNS; ACQUISITION; INDIVIDUATION; IMPLICATURES; QUANTIFIERS; MORPHOLOGY; PRAGMATICS;
D O I
10.1037/a0025283
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Is two ever a plural marker in child language? By some accounts, children bootstrap the distinction between the words one and two by observing their use with singular-plural marking (one ball/two balls). Others argue that the numeral two marks plurality before children begin using numerals to denote precise quantities. We tested the relation between numerals and singular-plural marking in English-speaking 2- and 3-year-olds by asking them to label sets of objects. When children were not prompted to use numerals they hardly ever did so, although they did frequently use plural marking. Thus, it does not appear that children spontaneously use numerals like two as plural markers. Also, children who used numerals when labeling sets were significantly more likely to use a plural marker than children who did not use numerals, suggesting that most children view plural marking as obligatory when numerals are used, rather than viewing the 2 forms as alternative markers of plurality. Finally, two was no more likely than other numerals to be used with unmarked nouns (i.e., as an alternative to the plural), suggesting that it does not have a special status as a plural marker. We conclude that two is not a plural marker in early child language.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1973, 1 LANGUAGE EARLY STA
[2]  
BADZINSKI DM, 1989, CHILD STUDY J, V19, P241
[3]  
Bale A., 2011, DEFAULT QUANTI UNPUB
[4]  
Bale A., 2009, NELS 38 P 38 M N E L, V1, P75
[5]  
Barner D, 2005, PROC ANN BUCLD, P61
[6]   Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count [J].
Barner, D ;
Snedeker, J .
COGNITION, 2005, 97 (01) :41-66
[7]   On the relation between the acquisition of singular-plural morpho-syntax and the conceptual distinction between one and more than one [J].
Barner, David ;
Thalwitz, Dora ;
Wood, Justin ;
Yang, Shu-Ju ;
Carey, Susan .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2007, 10 (03) :365-373
[8]   Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children's pragmatic inference [J].
Barner, David ;
Brooks, Neon ;
Bale, Alan .
COGNITION, 2011, 118 (01) :84-93
[9]   Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development [J].
Barner, David ;
Bachrach, Asaf .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 60 (01) :40-62
[10]   Finding one's meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development [J].
Barner, David ;
Chow, Katherine ;
Yang, Shu-Ju .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 58 (02) :195-219