Institutional volume and the effect of recipient risk on short-term mortality after orthotopic heart transplant

被引:56
作者
Arnaoutakis, George J. [1 ]
George, Timothy J. [1 ]
Allen, Jeremiah G. [1 ]
Russell, Stuart D. [2 ]
Shah, Ashish S. [1 ]
Conte, John V. [1 ]
Weiss, Eric S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Surg, Div Cardiac Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
HOSPITAL VOLUME; CANCER-SURGERY; RESECTION; CENTERS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; ASSOCIATION; OPERATIONS; SURVIVAL; MARYLAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.040
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We developed a validated 50-point recipient risk index predicting short-term mortality after orthotopic heart transplant (OHT). This study examined the relationship between institutional volume and recipient risk on post-OHT mortality. Methods: We used United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data to identify primary OHT recipients between January 2000 and April 2010. Centers were stratified by mean annual volume. Preoperative Index for Mortality Prediction After Cardiac Transplantation risk scores were calculated for each patient with our validated 50-point system. Primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year survivals. Multivariable logistic regression analysis included interaction terms to examine effect modification of risk and volume on mortality. Results: In all, 18,226 patients underwent transplant at 141 centers: 1173 (6.4%) recipients at low-volume centers (<7 procedures/y), 5353 (29.4%) at medium-volume centers (7-15 procedures/y), and 11,700 (64.2%) at high-volume centers (>15 procedures/y). Low center volume was associated with worse 1-year mortality (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.92; P < .001). For 1-year survival, there was significant positive interaction between center volume and recipient risk score (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07; P = .02), indicating effect of risk on mortality at low-volume centers greater than from either variable analyzed individually. Among high-risk recipients (score >= 10), 1-year survival was improved at high-volume centers (high, 79%; medium, 75%; low, 64%). Conclusions: In analysis of UNOS data with our validated recipient risk index, institutional volume acted as an effect modifier on association between risk and mortality. High-risk patients had higher mortality at low-volume centers; differences dissipated among lower-risk recipients. These data support a mandate for high-risk transplants at higher-volume centers. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:157-67)
引用
收藏
页码:157 / U238
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Association of center volume with outcome after liver and kidney transplantation [J].
Axelrod, DA ;
Guidinger, MK ;
McCullough, KP ;
Leichtman, AB ;
Punch, JD ;
Merion, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (06) :920-927
[2]   Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery - Understanding the volume-outcome relationship [J].
Billingsley, Kevin G. ;
Morris, Arden M. ;
Dominitz, Jason A. ;
Matthews, Barbara ;
Dobie, Sharon ;
Barlow, William ;
Wright, George E. ;
Baldwin, Laura-Mae .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2007, 142 (01) :23-31
[3]   Independent association between acute renal failure and mortality following cardiac surgery [J].
Chertow, GM ;
Levy, EM ;
Hammermeister, KE ;
Grover, F ;
Daley, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 104 (04) :343-348
[4]   Uterine cancer in Maryland: Impact of surgeon case volume and other prognostic factors on short-term mortality [J].
Diaz-Montes, Teresa P. ;
Zahurak, Marianna L. ;
Giuntoll, Robert L., II ;
Gardner, Ginger J. ;
Bristow, Robert E. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (03) :1043-1047
[5]   Hospital volume is related to clinical and economic outcomes of esophageal resection in Maryland [J].
Dimick, JB ;
Cattaneo, SM ;
Lipsett, PA ;
Pronovost, PJ ;
Heitmiller, RF .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (02) :334-339
[6]   Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery - A national study [J].
Finlayson, EVA ;
Goodney, PP ;
Birkmeyer, JD .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2003, 138 (07) :721-725
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF REGIONALIZATION ON COST AND OUTCOME FOR ONE GENERAL HIGH-RISK SURGICAL-PROCEDURE [J].
GORDON, TA ;
BURLEYSON, GP ;
TIELSCH, JM ;
CAMERON, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 221 (01) :43-49
[8]   Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection [J].
Harmon, JW ;
Tang, DG ;
Gordon, TA ;
Bowman, HM ;
Choti, MA ;
Kaufman, HS ;
Bender, JS ;
Duncan, MD ;
Magnuson, TH ;
Lillemoe, KD ;
Cameron, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) :404-411
[9]   THE EFFECT OF TRANSPLANT CENTER VOLUME ON CARDIAC TRANSPLANT OUTCOME - A REPORT OF THE UNITED-NETWORK-FOR-ORGAN-SHARING-SCIENTIFIC-REGISTRY [J].
HOSENPUD, JD ;
BREEN, TJ ;
EDWARDS, EB ;
DAILY, OP ;
HUNSICKER, LG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (23) :1844-1849
[10]   RELATION OF PERIOPERATIVE DEATHS TO HOSPITAL VOLUME AMONG PATIENTS UNDERGOING PANCREATIC RESECTION FOR MALIGNANCY [J].
LIEBERMAN, MD ;
KILBURN, H ;
LINDSEY, M ;
BRENNAN, MF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (05) :638-645