Radical retropubic prostatectomy in immunosuppressed transplant recipients

被引:24
|
作者
Thompson, R. Houston [1 ]
Leibovich, Bradley C. [1 ]
Karnes, R. Jeffrey [1 ]
Bergstralh, Eric J. [2 ]
Blute, Michael L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Biostat, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2008年 / 179卷 / 04期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; kidney transplantation; liver transplantation; heart transplantation;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.054
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgical treatment of transplant recipients in whom prostate cancer subsequently develops has been reported only sporadically in the literature. We reviewed our experience with radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with solid organ transplants. Materials and Methods: Using our prostatectomy registry we identified 17 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1988 and 2005 following organ transplantation. Clinicopathological features and outcome data were reviewed. Results: Kidney, liver and heart transplants were performed before radical retropubic prostatectomy in 9, 7 and 3 patients, respectively. Median age at transplant and time of radical retropubic prostatectomy was 51 (range 37 to 65) and 59 years (range 45 to 70), respectively. Median prostate specific antigen was 5.8 (range 2.6 to 12.9) and all patients had clinically localized disease. Ten patients had a pathological Gleason score of 6 while the remaining had Gleason scores 7 or greater. No patient had positive lymph nodes and only 2 patients had pT3a or greater disease. Early complications included wound infection in 2 (12%) patients along with hematoma and myocardial infarction in 1 (6%) patient each. Late complications included incontinence (I or more pads per day) in 2 patients while no patient had a hernia, bladder neck contracture, venous thrombosis or lymphocele. With a median followup of 4.9 years, biochemical recurrence developed in 1 patient and no patient had systemic progression or death due to prostate cancer. Conclusions: To our knowledge we report the largest experience with radical retropubic prostatectomy in transplant recipients. Our results suggest that radical retropubic prostatectomy is feasible for immunosuppressed patients, yet concern for infection and wound healing remain important. Healthy transplant recipients with an increased prostate specific antigen should undergo a prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1352
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR CANCER OF PROSTATE
    HUDSON, HC
    HOWLAND, RL
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1972, 108 (06): : 944 - &
  • [42] Is the open retropubic radical prostatectomy dead?
    Graefen, Markus
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (05) : 1281 - 1283
  • [43] Outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Noh, C
    Kshirsagar, A
    Mohler, JL
    UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (02) : 412 - 416
  • [44] Urethrovesical anastomosis in retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Barre, C.
    ANNALES D UROLOGIE, 2006, 40 (04) : 247 - 254
  • [45] Ambulatory radical retropubic prostatectomy - Comment
    Stein, JP
    Skinner, DG
    UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (03) : 447 - 448
  • [46] Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Recipients-A Multicenter Experience
    Schmidt, Jacob
    Yakac, Abdulbaki
    Peters, Robert
    Friedersdorff, Frank
    Kernig, Karoline
    Kienel, Anna
    Winterhagen, Franziska I.
    Koepp, Friedrich
    Foller, Susan
    DiQuilio, Francesca
    Weigand, Karl
    Flegar, Luka
    Reimold, Philipp
    Stoeckle, Michael
    Putz, Juliane
    Zeuschner, Philip
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 67 : 45 - 53
  • [47] Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Ko, Dicken S. C.
    UROLOGY, 2009, 74 (03) : 687 - 687
  • [48] Relative advantages and disadvantages of radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Gillitzer, R
    Thüroff, JW
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2002, 43 (02) : 167 - 190
  • [49] Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Brown, JA
    Garlitz, C
    Gomella, LG
    McGinnis, DE
    Diamond, SM
    Strup, SE
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2004, 22 (02) : 102 - 106
  • [50] Radical perineal prostatectomy verses radical retropubic prostatectomy: A clinical comparison.
    Kahn, SA
    Tiwari, A
    Narayan, P
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 61 - 61