A Multi-Criteria Project Assessment Framework for R&D Organizations in the IT Sector

被引:0
作者
Sokmen, Nermin [1 ]
机构
[1] TUBITAK BILGEM, Kocaeli, Turkey
来源
2014 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (PICMET) | 2014年
关键词
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; SELECTION CRITERIA; DECISION-MODEL; SYSTEM; INNOVATION; RISKS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
he project selection is one of the most important problems in Information Technology (IT) organizations. Project evaluation criteria with the assigned weights are used to evaluate, prioritize and select projects. Project evaluation criteria should be aligned with the specific objectives of the organization and accurately reflect the opinion of experts. The purpose of this paper is to present a multi-criteria project assessment framework for Research and Development (R&D) organizations in the IT sector. The paper first generates a two-dimensional project selection framework which consists of project scoring and risk assessment hierarchies. The project scoring hierarchy consists of eight scoring criteria namely, strategic criteria, financial criteria, marketing criteria, technological criteria, human resources criteria, organizational criteria, development process criteria, and environment criteria. The project uncertainties are calculated by threats caused by eight major factors namely, technology factors, financial factors, marketing factors, human resources factors, organizational factors, development process factors, customer/user factors, and outsourcing factors. In this study, the judgments are elicited from 20 experts with using a pair wise comparison matrix and aggregated by taking the geometric mean of the individual judgments. The analytical hierarchical process (AHP) is applied to calculate the relative importance of the each criterion and sub criterion.
引用
收藏
页码:2455 / 2466
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Selecting Projects on the Brazilian R&D Energy Sector: A Fuzzy-Based Approach for Criteria Selection [J].
Souza, Dalton G. B. ;
Silva, Carlos E. S. ;
Soma, Nei Y. .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :50209-50226
[32]   Adopting machine translation in the healthcare sector: A methodological multi-criteria review [J].
Zappatore, Marco ;
Ruggieri, Gilda .
COMPUTER SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2024, 84
[33]   Service-sector competition, innovation and R&D [J].
Tingvall, Patrik Gustavsson ;
Karpaty, Patrik .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 20 (01) :63-88
[34]   R&D in Europe: Sector Decomposition of Sources of (in)Efficiency [J].
Skrinjaric, Tihana .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
[35]   A MULTI-CRITERIA FRAMEWORK FOR OFFICE TENANTS' PREFERENCES AT OFFICE BUILDINGS [J].
Adnan, Yasmin Mohd ;
Daud, Md Nasir ;
Razali, Muhammad Najib Mohamed .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2015, 19 (03) :271-282
[36]   A Proposed Framework for Group-Based Multi-Criteria Recommendations [J].
Dixit, Veer Sain ;
Mehta, Harita ;
Bedi, Punam .
APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2014, 28 (10) :917-956
[37]   A Framework for Locating Logistic Facilities with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis [J].
Montibeller, Gilberto ;
Yoshizaki, Hugo .
EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 6576 :505-+
[38]   Assessment of fuel cell types for ships: Based on multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Inal, Omer Berkehan ;
Deniz, Cengiz .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 265
[39]   Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Project Management Competencies-A Case Study of Pakistani Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) [J].
Masood, Maher Yousaf Haroon ;
Sajid, Muhammad ;
Muhammad, Abdul Hafeez ;
Kraiem, Naoufel ;
Naveed, Quadri Noorulhasan .
IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 :70646-70661
[40]   A model-based assessment of the impact of revitalised R&D investments on the European power sector [J].
Wiesenthal, Tobias ;
Mercier, Arnaud ;
Schade, Burkhard ;
Petric, Hrvoje ;
Dowling, Paul .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (01) :105-112