The impact of using donor sperm in assisted reproductive technology cycles on perinatal outcomes

被引:13
|
作者
Yu, Bo [1 ]
Fritz, Rani [2 ,3 ]
Xie, Xianhong [4 ]
Negassa, Abdissa [4 ]
Jindal, Sangita [2 ,3 ]
Vega, Mario [2 ,3 ]
Buyuk, Erkan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Montefiores Inst Reprod Med & Hlth, Hartsdale, NY USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
Donor sperm; perinatal outcomes; ART cycle; partner sperm; paternal antigens; SEMINAL FLUID; PREECLAMPSIA; OOCYTE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of using donor sperm in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles on perinatal outcomes. Design: Historical cohort study. Setting: US national database from the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) from 2012 to 2013. Patient(s): Patients undergoing the first fresh autologous ART cycle using either donor or partner sperm. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Miscarriage, preterm birth, low birthweight rates. Results: A total of 134,710 fresh autologous ART cycles were evaluated from the SART CORS database. Following exclusion criteria and after restricting to the first cycle, 2,123 donor sperm and 42,799 partner sperm ART cycles were included in the final analyses. After adjusting for all confounding variables (including maternal age, race, body mass index, smoking status, gravidity, history of preterm birth, highest follicle stimulating hormone count, blastocyst transfer percentage, total embryo transferred, and etiology of infertility), no statistically significant differences in miscarriage rates, preterm births, very preterm births, low birthweight, and very low birthweight were observed. Birthweight was significantly lower in the partner sperm group than in the donor sperm group (3,292 +/- 601 and 3,233 +/- 592 g in donor and partner sperm groups, respectively, adjusted P value 0.003); however, this small absolute difference (adjusted effect estimate 42 g, 95% CI 14.7-70.9) does not carry clinical significance. Conclusions: The use of donor sperm in fresh autologous ART cycles was not associated with increased miscarriage, preterm births, or low birthweights, as compared to cycles using partner sperm. This information can be used in patient counseling to reassure patients using donor sperm in ART cycles. (C) 2018 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine. El resumen esta disponible en Espanol al final del articulo.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1289
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Maternal and perinatal outcomes in primiparous singleton pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology in British Columbia
    Eckler, Rebecca
    Liu, Yang Doris
    Pooni, Amrita
    Yong, Paul J.
    Lisonkova, Sarka
    Bedaiwy, Mohamed A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 291 : 106 - 111
  • [22] The impact of single-step and sequential embryo culture systems on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Sacha, Caitlin R.
    Gopal, Daksha
    Liu, Chia-Ling
    Cabral, Howard R.
    Stern, Judy E.
    Carusi, Daniela A.
    Racowsky, Catherine
    Bormann, Charles L.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 117 (06) : 1246 - 1254
  • [23] Are intracytoplasmic sperm injection and high serum estradiol compounding risk factors for adverse obstetric outcomes in assisted reproductive technology?
    Royster, Greene Donald
    Krishnamoorthy, Kavitha
    Csokmay, John M.
    Yauger, Belinda J.
    Chason, Rebecca J.
    DeCherney, Alan H.
    Wolff, Erin F.
    Hill, Micah J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (02) : 363 - U181
  • [24] Reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles are associated with donor BMI
    Cardozo, E. R.
    Karmon, A. E.
    Gold, J.
    Petrozza, J. C.
    Styer, A. K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (02) : 385 - 392
  • [25] Perinatal outcomes in lesbian couples employing shared motherhood IVF compared with those performing artificial insemination with donor sperm
    Matorras, R.
    Perez-Fernandez, S.
    Hubel, A.
    Ferrando, M.
    Quintana, F.
    Vendrell, A.
    Hernandez, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38 (05) : 895 - 907
  • [26] Perinatal complications and live-birth outcomes following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study
    Lei, Ling-Ling
    Lan, Yong-Lian
    Wang, Shu-Yu
    Feng, Wei
    Zhai, Zhi-Jin
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 132 (20) : 2408 - 2416
  • [27] Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile women conceiving without assisted reproductive technologies
    Jaques, Alice M.
    Amor, David J.
    Baker, H. W. Gordon
    Healy, David L.
    Ukoumunne, Obioha C.
    Breheny, Sue
    Garrett, Claire
    Halliday, Jane L.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (07) : 2674 - 2679
  • [28] Embryo biopsy and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies: an analysis of 16,246 frozen embryo transfer cycles reported in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcomes Reporting System
    Li, Mengmeng
    Kort, Jonathan
    Baker, Valerie L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (05) : 500.e1 - 500.e18
  • [29] Additional Adverse Perinatal Outcomes With No Effect on Neonatal Mortality and Birth Defects in Pregnancies Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Xiong, Yingying
    Zang, Xiaodong
    Xie, Tingting
    Yang, Chaolei
    Jiang, Xiaohua
    Chen, Mingwu
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 10
  • [30] Comparison of perinatal outcomes of vanishing twin and twin pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technology: A retrospective analysis
    Pradhan, Sujata
    Kamath, Mohan S.
    Selliah, Hepsy Y.
    Thomas, Sumi
    Chandy, Achamma
    Aleyamma, T. K.
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (04) : 253 - 258