The impact of using donor sperm in assisted reproductive technology cycles on perinatal outcomes

被引:13
|
作者
Yu, Bo [1 ]
Fritz, Rani [2 ,3 ]
Xie, Xianhong [4 ]
Negassa, Abdissa [4 ]
Jindal, Sangita [2 ,3 ]
Vega, Mario [2 ,3 ]
Buyuk, Erkan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Montefiores Inst Reprod Med & Hlth, Hartsdale, NY USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
Donor sperm; perinatal outcomes; ART cycle; partner sperm; paternal antigens; SEMINAL FLUID; PREECLAMPSIA; OOCYTE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of using donor sperm in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles on perinatal outcomes. Design: Historical cohort study. Setting: US national database from the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) from 2012 to 2013. Patient(s): Patients undergoing the first fresh autologous ART cycle using either donor or partner sperm. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Miscarriage, preterm birth, low birthweight rates. Results: A total of 134,710 fresh autologous ART cycles were evaluated from the SART CORS database. Following exclusion criteria and after restricting to the first cycle, 2,123 donor sperm and 42,799 partner sperm ART cycles were included in the final analyses. After adjusting for all confounding variables (including maternal age, race, body mass index, smoking status, gravidity, history of preterm birth, highest follicle stimulating hormone count, blastocyst transfer percentage, total embryo transferred, and etiology of infertility), no statistically significant differences in miscarriage rates, preterm births, very preterm births, low birthweight, and very low birthweight were observed. Birthweight was significantly lower in the partner sperm group than in the donor sperm group (3,292 +/- 601 and 3,233 +/- 592 g in donor and partner sperm groups, respectively, adjusted P value 0.003); however, this small absolute difference (adjusted effect estimate 42 g, 95% CI 14.7-70.9) does not carry clinical significance. Conclusions: The use of donor sperm in fresh autologous ART cycles was not associated with increased miscarriage, preterm births, or low birthweights, as compared to cycles using partner sperm. This information can be used in patient counseling to reassure patients using donor sperm in ART cycles. (C) 2018 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine. El resumen esta disponible en Espanol al final del articulo.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1289
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assisted reproductive technology with donor sperm: national trends and perinatal outcomes
    Gerkowicz, Sabrina A.
    Crawford, Sara B.
    Hipp, Heather S.
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (04) : 421.e1 - 421.e10
  • [2] Perinatal outcomes following IVF with use of donor versus partner sperm
    Kamath, Mohan Shashikant
    Antonisamy, Belavendra
    Selliah, Hepsy Y.
    La Marca, Antonio
    Sunkara, Sesh Kamal
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2018, 36 (06) : 705 - 710
  • [3] Effects of donor sperm on perinatal and neonatal outcomes resulting from in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study
    Gao, Xinyan
    Sun, Shihu
    Xie, Lei
    Lu, Shaoming
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (15)
  • [4] Surgically acquired sperm use for assisted reproductive technology: trends and perinatal outcomes, USA, 2004–2015
    Jennifer F. Kawwass
    Jeani Chang
    Sheree L. Boulet
    Ajay Nangia
    Akanksha Mehta
    Dmitry M. Kissin
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 1229 - 1237
  • [5] Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART)
    Declercq, Eugene
    Luke, Barbara
    Belanoff, Candice
    Cabral, Howard
    Diop, Hafsatou
    Gopal, Daksha
    Hoang, Lan
    Kotelchuck, Milton
    Stern, Judy E.
    Hornstein, Mark D.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (04) : 888 - 895
  • [6] Impacts of assisted reproductive technology on perinatal outcomes and offspring health
    Jin, Hong
    Sun, Yi-Juan
    Shu, Yi-Min
    REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 7 (01) : 56 - 63
  • [7] Trends and Correlates of Good Perinatal Outcomes in Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Joshi, Nikhil
    Kissin, Dmitry
    Anderson, John E.
    Session, Donna
    Macaluso, Maurizio
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (04) : 843 - 851
  • [8] Impacts of assisted reproductive technology on perinatal outcomes and offspring health
    Jin Hong
    Sun Yi-Juan
    Shu Yi-Min
    生殖与发育医学(英文), 2023, 07 (01)
  • [9] The Relationship of Assisted Reproductive Technology on Perinatal Outcomes in Triplet Gestations
    Shah, Jaimin S.
    Roman, Tania
    Viteri, Oscar A.
    Haidar, Ziad A.
    Ontiveros, Alejandra
    Sibai, Baha M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (14) : 1388 - 1393
  • [10] Surgically acquired sperm use for assisted reproductive technology: trends and perinatal outcomes, USA, 2004-2015
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Chang, Jeani
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Nangia, Ajay
    Mehta, Akanksha
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (07) : 1229 - 1237