Long-term Field Evaluation of Low-cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Nanjing

被引:39
|
作者
Bai, Lu [1 ]
Huang, Lin [1 ]
Wang, Zhenglu [2 ]
Ying, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Jun [1 ]
Shi, Xiaowen [1 ]
Hu, Jianlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Key Lab Atmospher Environm Monitoring & P, Jiangsu Collaborat Innovat Ctr Atmospher Environm, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PPD42NS; Field calibration; Long-term; Artificial neural network; NEURAL-NETWORK MODEL; YANGTZE-RIVER DELTA; AIR-POLLUTION; PREMATURE MORTALITY; PM2.5; CHINA; PM10; EXPOSURE; CITIES; RISK;
D O I
10.4209/aaqr.2018.11.0424
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensors can be widely deployed to measure aerosol concentrations at higher spatial and temporal resolutions than traditional instruments, but they need to be carefully calibrated under ambient conditions. In this study, a long-term field experiment was conducted from December 2015 to May 2017 at a site in Nanjing to evaluate the capabilities of in-house built low-cost PM monitors using the Shinyei PPD42NS sensor for ambient PM2.5 monitoring. A BAM-1020 particulate monitor was co-located with the low-cost sensors to provide reference readings. Least-square regressions with linear and power-law functions, and an artificial neural network (ANN) technique were used to convert electrical instrument readings to ambient aerosol concentrations. Applying the ANN technique resulted in the best estimation of the hourly PM2.5 (R-2 = 0.84; mean normalized bias = 12.7% and mean normalized error (MNE) = 29.7%). The low-cost sensors displayed relatively good performance with high aerosol concentrations but larger errors with concentrations below 35 mu g m(-3). High humidity (RH > 75%) can cause a larger MNE for these sensors, but the impact of temperature was negligible in this study. A clear sensor deterioration trend was observed during the 18-month field calibration. High correlations were found between the data from a single low-cost sensor and the data from the BAM-1020 when the low-cost sensor was individually calibrated, but the correlations between measurements taken by different low-cost sensor units were only moderate, possibly due to internal sensor variations. The results suggest that these low-cost sensors can measure ambient PM2.5 concentrations with an acceptable level of accuracy, which can and should be improved by calibrating each sensor individually. Special attention should be paid to the accuracy of these sensors after long-term application and in highly humid environments.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 253
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors
    Sayahi, T.
    Kaufman, D.
    Becnel, T.
    Kaur, K.
    Butterfield, A. E.
    Collingwood, S.
    Zhang, Y.
    Gaillardon, P. -E.
    Kelly, K. E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 255
  • [42] CFD Simulations Of An Aerosol Chamber For Calibration Of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors
    Drzymalla, Jan
    Lay, Yannic
    Sauermann, Marc
    Henne, Andreas
    INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PERFORMANCE APPROACHES (IAQ 2020), PT 1, 2021,
  • [43] Indoor Household Particulate Matter Measurements Using a Network of Low-cost Sensors
    Hegde, Shruti
    Min, Kyeong T.
    Moore, James
    Lundrigan, Philip
    Patwari, Neal
    Collingwood, Scott
    Balch, Alfred
    Kelly, Kerry E.
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (02) : 381 - 394
  • [44] Seasonally optimized calibrations improve low-cost sensor performance: long-term field evaluation of PurpleAir sensors in urban and rural India
    Campmier, Mark Joseph
    Gingrich, Jonathan
    Singh, Saumya
    Baig, Nisar
    Gani, Shahzad
    Upadhya, Adithi
    Agrawal, Pratyush
    Kushwaha, Meenakshi
    Mishra, Harsh Raj
    Pillarisetti, Ajay
    Vakacherla, Sreekanth
    Pathak, Ravi Kant
    Apte, Joshua S.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2023, 16 (19) : 4357 - 4374
  • [45] Airborne particulate matter monitoring in Kenya using calibrated low-cost sensors
    Pope, Francis D.
    Gatari, Michael
    Ng'ang'a, David
    Poynter, Alexander
    Blake, Rhiannon
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2018, 18 (20) : 15403 - 15418
  • [46] Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor
    Zamora, Misti Levy
    Xiong, Fulizi
    Gentner, Drew
    Kerkez, Branko
    Kohrman-Glaser, Joseph
    Koehler, Kirsten
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (02) : 838 - 849
  • [47] LOW-COST LONG-TERM STOCHASTIC INTEGRATOR
    WITTEN, IH
    MADAMS, PHC
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 1978, 14 (10) : 293 - 294
  • [48] Short-Term Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors Operated by the "AirSensEUR" Platform
    Pichlhoefer, Alexander
    Korjenic, Azra
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (15)
  • [49] Field calibration of fine particulate matter low-cost sensors in a highly industrialized semi-arid conurbation
    Villarreal-Marines, Mariana
    Perez-Rodriguez, Michael
    Mancilla, Yasmany
    Ortiz, Gabriela
    Mendoza, Alberto
    NPJ CLIMATE AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [50] Field calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors using artificial neural networks and affine response correction
    Koziel, Slawomir
    Pietrenko-Dabrowska, Anna
    Wojcikowski, Marek
    Pankiewicz, Bogdan
    MEASUREMENT, 2024, 230