Evaluating the importance of wolverine habitat predictors using a machine learning method

被引:3
作者
Carroll, Kathleen A. [1 ,2 ]
Hansen, Andrew J. [2 ]
Inman, Robert M. [3 ]
Lawrence, Rick L. [4 ]
Cherry, Michael
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, 1630 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Montana State Univ, Ecol Dept, POB 173460, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[3] Moniana Fish Wildlife & Pk, 1420 E 6th Ave, Helena, MT 59620 USA
[4] Montana State Univ, Land Resources & Environm Sci Dept, 334 Leon Johnson Hall,POB 173120, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
关键词
carnivore; Gulo gulo; habitat predictors; metapopulation; random forest; wolverine; GULO-GULO; SCALE; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION; CARNIVORES; MAMMALS; MODELS; SPACE;
D O I
10.1093/jmammal/gyab088
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
In the conterminous United States, wolverines (Gulo gulo) occupy semi-isolated patches of subalpine habitats at naturally low densities. Determining how to model wolverine habitat, particularly across multiple scales, can contribute greatly to wolverine conservation efforts. We used the machine-learning algoritlun random forest to determine how a novel analysis approach compared to the existing literature for future wolverine conservation efforts. We also determined how well a small suite of variables explained wolverine habitat use patterns at the second- and third-order selection scale by sex. We found that the importance of habitat covariates differed slightly by sex and selection scales. Snow water equivalent, distance to high-elevation talus, and latitude-adjusted elevation were the driving selective forces for wolverines across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem at both selection orders but performed better at the second order. Overall, our results indicate that wolverine habitat selection is, in large part, broadly explained by high-elevation structural features, and this confirms existing data. Our results suggest that for third-order analyses, additional fine-scale habitat data are necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:1466 / 1472
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Mismatch between goals and the scale of actions constrains adaptive carnivore management: the case of the wolverine in Sweden
    Aronsson, M.
    Persson, J.
    [J]. ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 20 (03) : 261 - 269
  • [2] Distribution and broadscale habitat relations of the wolverine in the contiguous United States
    Aubry, Keith B.
    Mckelvey, Kevin S.
    Copeland, Jeffrey P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 71 (07) : 2147 - 2158
  • [3] Bailey Vernon., 1930, Animal Life of Yellowstone Park
  • [4] GREATER YELLOWSTONE NATIVE UNGULATES - MYTHS AND REALITIES
    BERGER, J
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1991, 5 (03) : 353 - 363
  • [5] EMPIRICAL-MODELS FOR THE SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION OF WILDLIFE
    BUCKLAND, ST
    ELSTON, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1993, 30 (03) : 478 - 495
  • [6] The package "adehabitat" for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals
    Calenge, Clement
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 197 (3-4) : 516 - 519
  • [7] Carroll C, 2001, ECOL APPL, V11, P961, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0961:CAFSFC]2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] Testing landscape resistance layers and modeling connectivity for wolverines in the western United States
    Carroll, Kathleen A.
    Hansen, Andrew J.
    Inman, Robert M.
    Lawrence, Rick L.
    Hoegh, Andrew B.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 23
  • [10] The bioclimatic envelope of the wolverine (Gulo gulo): do climatic constraints limit its geographic distribution?
    Copeland, J. P.
    McKelvey, K. S.
    Aubry, K. B.
    Landa, A.
    Persson, J.
    Inman, R. M.
    Krebs, J.
    Lofroth, E.
    Golden, H.
    Squires, J. R.
    Magoun, A.
    Schwartz, M. K.
    Wilmot, J.
    Copeland, C. L.
    Yates, R. E.
    Kojola, I.
    May, R.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2010, 88 (03) : 233 - 246