On the Tightness of Convex Optimal Power Flow Model Based on Power Loss Relaxation

被引:0
作者
Yuan, Zhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Elect Power Syst Lab EPS Lab, Reykjavik, Iceland
来源
2021 IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGY EUROPE (ISGT EUROPE 2021) | 2021年
关键词
Optimal Power Flow; Convex Reformulation; Power Load; Tightness; Penalty Function;
D O I
10.1109/ISGTEUROPE52324.2021.9639934
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Optimal power flow (OPF) is the important decision-making model in operating the power system. The improvement of the OPF solution quality can provide huge technical and economic benefits. The convex reformulation of the original non-convex alternating current OPF (ACOPF) model is an efficient way to find the global optimal solution of the ACOPF model but disadvantages with the relaxation gaps. The existence of relaxation gaps hinders the practical application of convex OPF due to the AC-infeasibility problem. We evaluate and improve the tightness of the convex ACOPF model in this paper. Various power networks and nodal loads are considered in the evaluation. A unified evaluation framework is implemented in Julia programming language. This evaluation shows the sensitivity of the relaxation gaps and helps to benchmark the proposed tightness reinforcement approach (TRA). The proposed TRA is based on the penalty function method which penalizes the power loss relaxation in the objective function of the convex ACOPF model. A heuristic penalty algorithm is proposed to find the proper penalty parameter of the TRA. Numerical results show relaxation gaps exist in test cases especially for large-scale power networks under low nodal power loads. TRA is effective to reduce the relaxation gaps of the convex ACOPF model.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 361
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] Expected-security-cost optimal power flow with small-signal stability constraints
    Condren, John
    Gedra, Thomas W.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2006, 21 (04) : 1736 - 1743
  • [12] Branch Flow Model: Relaxations and Convexification-Part I
    Farivar, Masoud
    Low, Steven H.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (03) : 2554 - 2564
  • [13] Contingency Ranking With Respect to Overloads in Very Large Power Systems Taking Into Account Uncertainty, Preventive, and Corrective Actions
    Fliscounakis, Stephane
    Panciatici, Patrick
    Capitanescu, Florin
    Wehenkel, Louis
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (04) : 4909 - 4917
  • [14] Exact Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow in Radial Networks
    Gan, Lingwen
    Li, Na
    Topcu, Ufuk
    Low, Steven H.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2015, 60 (01) : 72 - 87
  • [15] Multi-Source Distributed Energy Resources Management System Based on Pattern Search Optimal Solution Using Nonlinearized Power Flow Constraints
    Machado, Luis Fernando Moreira
    Santo, Silvio Giuseppe Di
    Junior, Giovanni Manassero
    Itiki, Rodney
    Manjrekar, Madhav D.
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 30374 - 30385
  • [16] Weiting Xu, 2019, 2019 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Asia (ISGT Asia), P3272, DOI 10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2019.8881734
  • [17] Optimization of an Offshore Oilfield Multi-Platform Interconnected Power System Structure
    Yu, Qingguang
    Jiang, Zhicheng
    Liu, Yuming
    Li, Le
    Long, Gaoxiang
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 5128 - 5139
  • [18] Properties of convex optimal power flow model based on power loss relaxation
    Yuan, Zhao
    Paolone, Mario
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2020, 186
  • [19] Multi-User Shared Access for Internet of Things
    Yuan, Zhifeng
    Yu, Guanghui
    Li, Weimin
    Yuan, Yifei
    Wang, Xinhui
    Xu, Jun
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 83RD VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC SPRING), 2016,
  • [20] MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education
    Zimmerman, Ray Daniel
    Edmundo Murillo-Sanchez, Carlos
    Thomas, Robert John
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (01) : 12 - 19