On the Tightness of Convex Optimal Power Flow Model Based on Power Loss Relaxation

被引:0
作者
Yuan, Zhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Elect Power Syst Lab EPS Lab, Reykjavik, Iceland
来源
2021 IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGY EUROPE (ISGT EUROPE 2021) | 2021年
关键词
Optimal Power Flow; Convex Reformulation; Power Load; Tightness; Penalty Function;
D O I
10.1109/ISGTEUROPE52324.2021.9639934
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Optimal power flow (OPF) is the important decision-making model in operating the power system. The improvement of the OPF solution quality can provide huge technical and economic benefits. The convex reformulation of the original non-convex alternating current OPF (ACOPF) model is an efficient way to find the global optimal solution of the ACOPF model but disadvantages with the relaxation gaps. The existence of relaxation gaps hinders the practical application of convex OPF due to the AC-infeasibility problem. We evaluate and improve the tightness of the convex ACOPF model in this paper. Various power networks and nodal loads are considered in the evaluation. A unified evaluation framework is implemented in Julia programming language. This evaluation shows the sensitivity of the relaxation gaps and helps to benchmark the proposed tightness reinforcement approach (TRA). The proposed TRA is based on the penalty function method which penalizes the power loss relaxation in the objective function of the convex ACOPF model. A heuristic penalty algorithm is proposed to find the proper penalty parameter of the TRA. Numerical results show relaxation gaps exist in test cases especially for large-scale power networks under low nodal power loads. TRA is effective to reduce the relaxation gaps of the convex ACOPF model.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 361
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, IEEE T SMART GRID
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1982, Time-scale modeling of dynamic networks with applications to power systems
  • [3] Semidefinite programming for optimal power flow problems
    Bai, Xiaoqing
    Wei, Hua
    Fujisawa, Katsuki
    Wang, Yong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2008, 30 (6-7) : 383 - 392
  • [4] Bergen A., 2000, Power Systems Analysis
  • [5] Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing
    Bezanson, Jeff
    Edelman, Alan
    Karpinski, Stefan
    Shah, Viral B.
    [J]. SIAM REVIEW, 2017, 59 (01) : 65 - 98
  • [6] Grid Structural Characteristics as Validation Criteria for Synthetic Networks
    Birchfield, Adam B.
    Xu, Ti
    Gegner, Kathleen M.
    Shetye, Komal S.
    Overbye, Thomas J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (04) : 3258 - 3265
  • [7] Cain M. B., 2012, History of Optimal Power Flow and Formulations, V1, P1
  • [8] State-of-the-art, challenges, and future trends in security constrained optimal power flow
    Capitanescu, F.
    Martinez Ramos, J. L.
    Panciatici, P.
    Kirschen, D.
    Marano Marcolini, A.
    Platbrood, L.
    Wehenkel, L.
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 81 (08) : 1731 - 1741
  • [9] Carpentier J., 1962, Bulletin de la Societe Francaise des Electriciens, V3, P431
  • [10] Bound Tightening for the Alternating Current Optimal Power Flow Problem
    Chen, Chen
    Atamturk, Alper
    Oren, Shmuel S.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (05) : 3729 - 3736