Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP

被引:433
作者
Kutlu, Ahmet Can [1 ]
Ekmekcioglu, Mehmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34367 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] FORD OTOSAN, Dept Prod Planning, TR-41650 Golcuk, Izmit, Turkey
关键词
Fuzzy FMEA; Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy TOPSIS; DECISION-MAKING; PLANT LOCATION; SELECTION; FMEA; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a widely used engineering technique for designing, identifying and eliminating known and/or potential failures, problems, errors and so on from system, design, process, and/or service before they reach the customer (Stamatis, 1995). In a typical FMEA, for each failure modes, three risk factors; severity (S), occurrence (O), and detectability (D) are evaluated and a risk priority number (RPN) is obtained by multiplying these factors. There are significant efforts which have been made in FMEA literature to overcome the shortcomings of the crisp RPN calculation. In this study a fuzzy approach, allowing experts to use linguistic variables for determining S, O, and D, is considered for FMEA by applying fuzzy 'technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution' (TOPSIS) integrated with fuzzy 'analytical hierarchy process' (AHP). The hypothetical case study demonstrated the applicability of the model in FMEA under fuzzy environment. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Analysis of the efficiency of insurance companies in Serbia using the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods [J].
Ksenija, Mandic ;
Boris, Delibasic ;
Snezana, Knezevic ;
Sladjana, Benkovic .
ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2017, 30 (01) :550-565
[42]   Application of MICMAC, Fuzzy AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Evaluation of the Maintenance Factors Affecting Sustainable Manufacturing [J].
Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, Malgorzata ;
Antosz, Katarzyna ;
Wyczolkowski, Ryszard ;
Mazurkiewicz, Dariusz ;
Sun, Bo ;
Qian, Cheng ;
Ren, Yi .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (05)
[43]   Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods [J].
Do, Quang Hung ;
Tran, Van Trang ;
Tran, The Tuan .
HELIYON, 2024, 10 (11)
[44]   A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to software requirements selection [J].
Nazim, Mohd. ;
Mohammad, Chaudhary Wali ;
Sadiq, Mohd. .
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 61 (12) :10851-10870
[45]   An integrated approach for multiple criteria supplier selection combining Fuzzy Delphi, Fuzzy AHP & Fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Sultana, Ineen ;
Ahmed, Imtiaz ;
Azeem, Abdullahil .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 29 (04) :1273-1287
[46]   An integrated approach of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS in modeling supply chain coordination [J].
Shukla, Rajendra Kumar ;
Garg, Dixit ;
Agarwal, Ashish .
PRODUCTION AND MANUFACTURING RESEARCH-AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL, 2014, 2 (01) :415-437
[47]   Cargo type selection procedure using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS techniques: 'the case of dry bulk cargo ships' [J].
Ozdemir, Unal ;
Guneroglu, Abdulaziz .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2018, 10 (03) :259-280
[48]   Fuzzy Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Using Summative Defuzzification Methods [J].
Pokoradi, Laszlo ;
Kocak, Sinan ;
Toth-Laufer, Edit .
ACTA POLYTECHNICA HUNGARICA, 2021, 18 (09) :111-126
[49]   Fuzzy Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Using Summative Defuzzification Methods [J].
Pokoradi, Laszlo ;
Kocak, Sinan ;
Toth-Laufer, Edit .
ACTA POLYTECHNICA HUNGARICA, 2021, 18 (10) :111-+
[50]   Fermatean fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach for occupational risk assessment in manufacturing [J].
Gul, Muhammet ;
Lo, Huai-Wei ;
Yucesan, Melih .
COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 7 (05) :2635-2653