Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP

被引:433
作者
Kutlu, Ahmet Can [1 ]
Ekmekcioglu, Mehmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34367 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] FORD OTOSAN, Dept Prod Planning, TR-41650 Golcuk, Izmit, Turkey
关键词
Fuzzy FMEA; Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy TOPSIS; DECISION-MAKING; PLANT LOCATION; SELECTION; FMEA; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a widely used engineering technique for designing, identifying and eliminating known and/or potential failures, problems, errors and so on from system, design, process, and/or service before they reach the customer (Stamatis, 1995). In a typical FMEA, for each failure modes, three risk factors; severity (S), occurrence (O), and detectability (D) are evaluated and a risk priority number (RPN) is obtained by multiplying these factors. There are significant efforts which have been made in FMEA literature to overcome the shortcomings of the crisp RPN calculation. In this study a fuzzy approach, allowing experts to use linguistic variables for determining S, O, and D, is considered for FMEA by applying fuzzy 'technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution' (TOPSIS) integrated with fuzzy 'analytical hierarchy process' (AHP). The hypothetical case study demonstrated the applicability of the model in FMEA under fuzzy environment. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection [J].
Lima Junior, Francisco Rodrigues ;
Osiro, Lauro ;
Ribeiro Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2014, 21 :194-209
[32]   Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection [J].
İrfan Ertuğrul ;
Nilsen Karakaşoğlu .
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 39 :783-795
[33]   Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection [J].
Ertugrul, Irfan ;
Karakasoglu, Nilsen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (7-8) :783-795
[34]   Evaluation of an Apartment Selection Model by Integrating Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Luc M.H. ;
Nguyen Q.V. ;
Do Q.H. ;
Van Trang T. .
International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 2022, 11 (01)
[36]   Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment [J].
Dagdeviren, Metin ;
Yavuz, Serkan ;
Kilinc, Nevzat .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) :8143-8151
[37]   Using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approaches for assessing safety conditions at worksites in construction industry [J].
Basahel A. ;
Taylan O. .
International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 2016, 6 (04) :728-745
[38]   Selection model of chemical tanker ships for cargo types using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Arican, Ozan Hikmet ;
Kara, Esma Gul Emecen .
REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2024, 78
[39]   An integrated Fuzzy MCDM approach for modelling and prioritising the enablers of responsiveness in automotive supply chain using Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Rinu Sathyan ;
P. Parthiban ;
R. Dhanalakshmi ;
M. S. Sachin .
Soft Computing, 2023, 27 :257-277
[40]   Fuzzy TOPSIS-based computerized maintenance management system selection [J].
Uysal, Fahriye ;
Tosun, Omur .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 23 (02) :212-228