Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP

被引:433
作者
Kutlu, Ahmet Can [1 ]
Ekmekcioglu, Mehmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34367 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] FORD OTOSAN, Dept Prod Planning, TR-41650 Golcuk, Izmit, Turkey
关键词
Fuzzy FMEA; Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy TOPSIS; DECISION-MAKING; PLANT LOCATION; SELECTION; FMEA; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a widely used engineering technique for designing, identifying and eliminating known and/or potential failures, problems, errors and so on from system, design, process, and/or service before they reach the customer (Stamatis, 1995). In a typical FMEA, for each failure modes, three risk factors; severity (S), occurrence (O), and detectability (D) are evaluated and a risk priority number (RPN) is obtained by multiplying these factors. There are significant efforts which have been made in FMEA literature to overcome the shortcomings of the crisp RPN calculation. In this study a fuzzy approach, allowing experts to use linguistic variables for determining S, O, and D, is considered for FMEA by applying fuzzy 'technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution' (TOPSIS) integrated with fuzzy 'analytical hierarchy process' (AHP). The hypothetical case study demonstrated the applicability of the model in FMEA under fuzzy environment. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey's energy planning [J].
Ervural, Beyzanur Cayir ;
Zaim, Selim ;
Demirel, Omer F. ;
Aydin, Zeynep ;
Delen, Dursun .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :1538-1550
[22]   Indicators of Entrepreneurial University: Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach [J].
Kiani Mavi R. .
Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2014, 5 (2) :370-387
[23]   An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach in the hotel industry [J].
Nguyen Quang Vinh ;
Quang Hung Do ;
Luc Manh Hien .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 9 (10) :135-148
[24]   Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Samvedi, Avinash ;
Jain, Vipul ;
Chan, Felix T. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (08) :2433-2442
[25]   Sustainable Configuration of the Tunisian Olive Oil Supply Chain Using a Fuzzy TOPSIS-Based Approach [J].
Jellali, Ahlem ;
Hachicha, Wafik ;
Aljuaid, Awad M. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (02) :1-20
[26]   Assessment of CSR based supply chain performance system using an integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach [J].
Tyagi, Mohit ;
Kumar, Pradeep ;
Kumar, Dinesh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 21 (04) :378-406
[27]   THE EVALUATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS BY USING FUZZY AHP, FUZZY TOPSIS AND AN INTEGRATED METHOD: A CASE STUDY [J].
Turker, Yasemin Altun ;
Baynal, Kasim ;
Turker, Turgay .
TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2019, 20 (02) :195-218
[28]   Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul [J].
Ahmet Beskese ;
H. Handan Demir ;
H. Kurtulus Ozcan ;
H. Eser Okten .
Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73 :3513-3521
[29]   Investigation and Assessment the Level of SMES Leanness Using Fuzzy Dematel/Fuzzy AHP/Fuzzy Topsis Integrated Model [J].
Al-Baldawi, Zainab ;
Sawsan, AllaEldin. H. Kassam ;
Al-Zubaidi, Sabeeh A. .
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2024, 32 (04) :537-547
[30]   Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives [J].
Torfi, Fatemeh ;
Farahani, Reza Zanjirani ;
Rezapour, Shabnam .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 10 (02) :520-528