Toward Improving Global Estimates of Field Soil Water Capacity

被引:42
作者
Nemes, Attila [1 ]
Pachepsky, Yakov A. [2 ]
Timlin, Dennis J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dep Plant Sci & Landscape Architecture, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Environ Microbial & Food Safety Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Crop Syst & Global Change Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
AVAILABLE WATER; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; RETENTION;
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2010.0251
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Field capacity or field water capacity (FC) is defined as the water content of a soil following saturation with water and aft er free drainage is negligible. Different recommendations exist worldwide on which, if any, pressure should be used in laboratory measurements to approximate the FC of the soil. Research has oft en deemed any such pressures to be inadequate to approximate FC for soils of all textures. We used a data collection from the literature to evaluate if corrections can be made to improve the estimation of FC from -33 kPa water retention (W33). Regression tree modeling coupled with jack-knife cross-validation was used to identify the best predictors-sand, silt, clay and the measured W33 value-to estimate the difference between W33 and FC. Such predictions were then used to adjust the W33 value as the estimate of FC. An improvement in estimating FC was seen in general statistical terms, and texture-specific bias was also greatly reduced. This solution may allow the reliable use of a single pressure in the laboratory to approximate FC, which may be the only feasible option for large-scale studies.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 812
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] ESTIMATING SOIL-WATER CHARACTERISTICS FROM SIMPLER PROPERTIES OR LIMITED DATA
    AHUJA, LR
    NANEY, JW
    WILLIAMS, RD
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1985, 49 (05) : 1100 - 1105
  • [2] COMPARISON OF ESTIMATION METHODS OF SOIL STRENGTH IN FIVE SOILS
    Ajayi, Ayodele Ebenezer
    Dias, Moacir de Souza, Jr.
    Curi, Nilton
    Araujo, Cezar Francisco, Jr.
    Aladenola, Olanike Olaiya
    Teixeira Souza, Thiago Tadeu
    Inda Junior, Alberto Vasconcellos
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2009, 33 (03): : 487 - 495
  • [3] Cassel D. K., 1986, Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, P901
  • [4] MODELS FOR ESTIMATING INSITU POTENTIAL EXTRACTABLE WATER USING SOIL PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL-PROPERTIES
    CASSEL, DK
    RATLIFF, LF
    RITCHIE, JT
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1983, 47 (04) : 764 - 769
  • [5] Clark LA., 2017, Statistical models in S, P377, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9780203738535, 10.1201/9780203738535-9, DOI 10.1201/9780203738535-9]
  • [6] HAISE HOWARD R., 1955, SOIL SCI SOC AMER PROC, V19, P20
  • [7] Pedotransfer functions for estimating plant available water and bulk density in Swedish agricultural soils
    Katterer, T.
    Andren, O.
    Jansson, P-E.
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2006, 56 (04) : 263 - 276
  • [8] Kirkham MB, 2005, PRINCIPLES OF SOIL AND PLANT WATER RELATIONS, P1
  • [9] Probabilistic approach to the identification of input variables to estimate hydraulic conductivity
    Lilly, A.
    Nemes, A.
    Rawls, W. J.
    Pachepsky, Ya. A.
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2008, 72 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [10] Improving the field estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity in soil survey
    McKenzie, N
    Jacquier, D
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1997, 35 (04): : 803 - 825