Identifiability of the Latent Attribute Space and Conditions of Q-Matrix Completeness for Attribute Hierarchy Models

被引:1
作者
Kohn, Hans-Friedrich [1 ]
Chiu, Chia-Yi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
来源
QUANTITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY | 2018年 / 233卷
关键词
Cognitive diagnosis; Attribute hierarchy; Latent attribute space; Q-matrix; Completeness; DINA model; COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-77249-3_30
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Educational researchers have argued that a realistic view of the role of attributes in cognitively diagnostic modeling should account for the possibility that attributes are not isolated entities, but interdependent in their effect on test performance. Different approaches have been discussed in the literature; among them the proposition to impose a hierarchical structure so that mastery of one or more attributes is a prerequisite of mastering one or more other attributes. A hierarchical organization of attributes constrains the latent attribute space such that several proficiency classes, as they exist if attributes are not hierarchically organized, are no longer defined, because the corresponding attribute combinations cannot occur with the given attribute hierarchy. Hence, the identification of the latent attribute space is often difficult-especially, if the number of attributes is large. As an additional complication, constructing a complete Q-matrix may not at all be straightforward if the attributes underlying the test items are supposed to have a hierarchical structure. In this article, the conditions of identifiability of the latent space if attributes are hierarchically organized and the conditions of completeness of the Q-matrix are studied.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 375
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: Theory and Applications [J].
Chiu, Chia-Yi ;
Douglas, Jeffrey A. ;
Li, Xiaodong .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2009, 74 (04) :633-665
[2]   Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis [J].
De la Torre, J ;
Douglas, JA .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2004, 69 (03) :333-353
[3]   The Generalized DINA Model Framework [J].
de la Torre, Jimmy .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2011, 76 (02) :179-199
[4]  
DiBello LV, 2007, HANDB STAT, V26, P979, DOI 10.1016/S0169-7161(06)26031-0
[5]  
Haberman SJ, 2007, HANDB STAT, V26, P1031, DOI 10.1016/S0169-7161(06)26040-1
[6]  
Haertel E.H, 1994, TESTING THEORY NEW G, P359
[8]   Defining a Family of Cognitive Diagnosis Models Using Log-Linear Models with Latent Variables [J].
Henson, Robert A. ;
Templin, Jonathan L. ;
Willse, John T. .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2009, 74 (02) :191-210
[9]   Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory [J].
Junker, BW ;
Sijtsma, K .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 25 (03) :258-272
[10]   A PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING THE COMPLETENESS OF THE Q-MATRICES OF COGNITIVELY DIAGNOSTIC TESTS [J].
Kohn, Hans-Friedrich ;
Chiu, Chia-Yi .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2017, 82 (01) :112-132