Physicians' Attitudes Toward Prescribable mHealth Apps and Implications for Adoption in Germany: Mixed Methods Study

被引:77
作者
Dahlhausen, Florian [1 ]
Zinner, Maximillian [1 ]
Bieske, Linn [2 ]
Ehlers, Jan P. [1 ]
Boehme, Philip [2 ]
Fehring, Leonard [2 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Sch Med, Didact & Educ Res Hlth Care, Witten, Germany
[2] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Sch Med, Alfred Herrhausen Str 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany
关键词
mobile health; mHealth; digital health; apps; physicians; general practitioners; technology acceptance; adoption; HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS; USER ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.2196/33012
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In October 2020, Germany became the first country, worldwide, to approve certain mobile health (mHealth) apps, referred to as DiGA (Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen, in German, meaning digital health applications), for prescription with costs covered by standard statutory health insurance. Yet, this option has only been used to a limited extent so far. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate physicians' and psychotherapists' current attitudes toward mHealth apps, barriers to adoption, and potential remedies. Methods: We conducted a two-stage sequential mixed methods study. In phase one, semistructured interviews were conducted with physicians and psychotherapists for questionnaire design. In phase two, an online survey was conducted among general practitioners, physicians, and psychotherapists. Results: A total of 1308 survey responses by mostly outpatient-care general practitioners, physicians, and psychotherapists from across Germany who could prescribe DiGA were recorded, making this the largest study on mHealth prescriptions to date. A total of 62.1% (807/1299) of respondents supported the opportunity to prescribe DiGA. Improved adherence (997/1294, 77.0%), health literacy (842/1294, 65.1%), and disease management (783/1294, 60.5%) were most frequently seen as benefits of DiGA. However, only 30.3% (393/1299) of respondents planned to prescribe DiGA, varying greatly by medical specialty. Professionals are still facing substantial barriers, such as insufficient information (1135/1295, 87.6%), reimbursement for DiGA-related medical services (716/1299, 55.1%), medical evidence (712/1298, 54.9%), legal uncertainties (680/1299, 52.3%), and technological uncertainties (658/1299, 50.7%). To support professionals who are unsure of prescribing DiGA, extended information campaigns (1104/1297, 85.1%) as well as recommendations from medical associations (1041/1297, 80.3%) and medical colleagues (1024/1297, 79.0%) were seen as the most impactful remedies. Conclusions: To realize the benefits from DiGA through increased adoption, additional information sharing about DiGA from trusted bodies, reimbursement for DiGA-related medical services, and further medical evidence are recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[22]   Telemonitoring for chronic heart failure: the views of patients and healthcare professionals - a qualitative study [J].
Fairbrother, Peter ;
Ure, Jenny ;
Hanley, Janet ;
McCloughan, Lucy ;
Denvir, Martin ;
Sheikh, Aziz ;
McKinstry, Brian .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2014, 23 (1-2) :132-144
[23]   m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review [J].
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre ;
Ngangue, Patrice ;
Payne-Gagnon, Julie ;
Desmartis, Marie .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2016, 23 (01) :212-220
[24]   Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals [J].
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre ;
Desmartis, Marie ;
Labrecque, Michel ;
Car, Josip ;
Pagliari, Claudia ;
Pluye, Pierre ;
Fremont, Pierre ;
Gagnon, Johanne ;
Tremblay, Nadine ;
Legare, France .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 36 (01) :241-277
[25]   Germany's digital health reforms in the COVID-19 era: lessons and opportunities for other countries [J].
Gerke, Sara ;
Stern, Ariel D. ;
Minssen, Timo .
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2020, 3 (01)
[26]  
Hamine Saee, 2015, J Med Internet Res, V17, pe52, DOI 10.2196/jmir.3951
[27]   Smartphone use in ophthalmology: What is their place in clinical practice? [J].
Hogarty, Daniel T. ;
Hogarty, Joseph P. ;
Hewitt, Alex W. .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 65 (02) :250-262
[28]   Mobile health technology evaluation: Innovativeness and efficacy vs. cost effectiveness [J].
Idrish, Sherina ;
Rifat, Afrin ;
Iqbal, Mehree ;
Nisha, Nabila .
International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 2017, 13 (02) :1-21
[29]   Mobile Technologies: Expectancy, Usage, and Acceptance of Clinical Staff and Patients at a University Medical Center [J].
Illiger, Kristin ;
Hupka, Markus ;
von Jan, Ute ;
Wichelhaus, Daniel ;
Albrecht, Urs-Vito .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2014, 2 (04)
[30]   What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions [J].
Iribarren, Sarah J. ;
Cato, Kenrick ;
Falzon, Louise ;
Stone, Patricia W. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02)