Why mammography screening has not lived up to expectations from the randomised trials

被引:46
作者
Gotzsche, Peter C. [1 ]
Jorgensen, Karsten Juhl [1 ]
Zahl, Per-Henrik [2 ]
Maehlen, Jan [3 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Nordic Cochrane Ctr, Dept 3343, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, N-0405 Oslo, Norway
[3] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Tumour size; Tumour stage; Mammography screening; Overdiagnosis; Breast cancer mortality; BREAST-CANCER MORTALITY; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; LYMPH-NODE STATUS; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; TREND ANALYSIS; SOJOURN TIME; OVERDIAGNOSIS; RATES; WOMEN; US;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-011-9867-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We analysed the relation between tumour sizes and stages and the reported effects on breast cancer mortality with and without screening in trials and observational studies. The average tumour sizes in all the trials suggest only a 12% reduction in breast cancer mortality, which agrees with the 10% reported in the most reliable trials. Recent studies of tumour sizes and tumour stages show that screening has not lowered the rate of advanced cancers. In agreement with this, recent observational studies of breast cancer mortality have failed to find an effect of screening. In contrast, screening leads to serious harms in healthy women through overdiagnosis with subsequent overtreatment and false-positive mammograms. We suggest that the rationale for breast screening be urgently reassessed by policy-makers. The observed decline in breast cancer mortality in many countries seems to be caused by improved adjuvant therapy and breast cancer awareness, not screening. We also believe it is more important to reduce the incidence of cancer than to detect it 'early.' Avoiding getting screening mammograms reduces the risk of becoming a breast cancer patient by one-third.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 21
页数:7
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING AND MORTALITY FROM BREAST-CANCER - THE MALMO MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING TRIAL [J].
ANDERSSON, I ;
ASPERGREN, K ;
JANZON, L ;
LANDBERG, T ;
LINDHOLM, K ;
LINELL, F ;
LJUNGBERG, O ;
RANSTAM, J ;
SIGFUSSON, B .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 297 (6654) :943-948
[3]   CANCER PREVENTION IN PRIMARY-CARE - SCREENING AND SELF-EXAMINATION FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
AUSTOKER, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6948) :168-174
[4]  
AUTIER P, 2011, ANN ONCOL 0120
[5]   Breast cancer mortality in neighbouring European countries with different levels of screening but similar access to treatment: trend analysis of WHO mortality database [J].
Autier, Philippe ;
Boniol, Mathieu ;
Gavin, Anna ;
Vatten, Lars J. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
[6]   Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database [J].
Autier, Philippe ;
Boniol, Mathieu ;
LaVecchia, Carlo ;
Vatten, Lars ;
Gavin, Anna ;
Hery, Clarisse ;
Heanue, Mary .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 :335
[7]   Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists - Findings from a national sample [J].
Beam, CA ;
Layde, PM ;
Sullivan, DC .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (02) :209-213
[8]   Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer [J].
Berry, DA ;
Cronin, KA ;
Plevritis, SK ;
Fryback, DG ;
Clarke, L ;
Zelen, M ;
Mandelblatt, JS ;
Yakovlev, AY ;
Habbema, JDF ;
Feuer, EJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) :1784-1792
[9]   EXTRA INCIDENCE CAUSED BY MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING [J].
BOER, R ;
WARMERDAM, P ;
DEKONING, H ;
VANOORTMARSSEN, G .
LANCET, 1994, 343 (8903) :979-979
[10]  
Byers T, 1999, CANCER, V86, P715, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990815)86:4<715::AID-CNCR22>3.3.CO