Why is it that differently doped regions in semiconductors are visible in low voltage SEM?

被引:28
作者
El-Gomati, MM [1 ]
Wells, TCR
Müllerová, I
Frank, L
Jayakody, H
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Elect, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] AS CR, Inst Sci Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic
关键词
doping of semiconductors; electronic contrast of scanning; electron microscope (SEM) imaging; inspection of patterns;
D O I
10.1109/TED.2003.821884
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Although doped regions in semiconductors have been shown to give a different secondary electron yield in low-voltage scanning electron microscopy, the basic interpretation of this contrast has been difficult. It is accepted that this contrast stem from electronic phenomenon rather than atomic number differences between differently doped regions. However, the question is whether variations in the patch fields above the sample surface, balancing variations in the inner potentials, or surface coatings and/or surface states are the mechanisms responsible for the observed contrast. The present study reports on comparative experiments of these two models and demonstrates that the image contrast can be controlled by the presence of thin-surface metallic coatings. These results are the first evidence of the adlayer contacts, i.e., the subsurface electric fields instead of the patch fields above the surface, being responsible for the secondary electron contrast of doped semiconductors imaged in low voltage scanning electron microscopes under standard vacuum conditions, and they pave the way for the routine use of this method in semiconductor research and industry.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 292
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   HYDROGEN ACTION IN THE SURFACE SPACE-CHARGE REGION OF HIGHLY DOPED SILICON [J].
AKREMI, A ;
LACHARME, JP ;
SEBENNE, CA .
PHYSICA B, 1991, 170 (1-4) :503-506
[2]   Very-low-energy electron microscopy of doped semiconductors [J].
El-Gomati, MM ;
Wells, TCR .
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2001, 79 (18) :2931-2933
[3]   Dopant profiling with the scanning electron microscope - A study of Si [J].
Elliott, SL ;
Broom, RF ;
Humphreys, CJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2002, 91 (11) :9116-9122
[4]  
GEIS M, 1989, HDB ION BEAM PROCESS, P219
[5]   RELATION BETWEEN AN ATOMIC ELECTRONEGATIVITY SCALE AND WORK FUNCTION [J].
MICHAELSON, HB .
IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1978, 22 (01) :72-80
[6]   Imaging of the boron doping in silicon using low energy SEM [J].
Müllerová, I ;
El-Gomati, MM ;
Frank, L .
ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2002, 93 (3-4) :223-243
[7]   FIELD-EMISSION SEM IMAGING OF COMPOSITIONAL AND DOPING LAYER SEMICONDUCTOR SUPERLATTICES [J].
PEROVIC, DD ;
CASTELL, MR ;
HOWIE, A ;
LAVOIE, C ;
TIEDJE, T ;
COLE, JSW .
ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 1995, 58 (01) :104-113
[8]   Mechanism for secondary electron dopant contrast in the SEM [J].
Sealy, CP ;
Castell, MR ;
Wilshaw, PR .
JOURNAL OF ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, 2000, 49 (02) :311-321
[9]   SURFACE STATES FROM PHOTOEMISSION THRESHOLD MEASUREMENTS ON A CLEAN, CLEAVED, SI(111) SURFACE [J].
SEBENNE, C ;
BOLMONT, D ;
GUICHAR, G ;
BALKANSKI, M .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1975, 12 (08) :3280-3285
[10]  
SEILER H, 1967, Z ANGEW PHYSIK, V22, P249