Temporal Trend and Time-Varying Effect of Preemptive Second Kidney Transplantation on Graft Survival: A 30-Year Single-Center Cohort Study

被引:5
作者
Girerd, S. [1 ]
Girerd, N. [2 ,3 ]
Aarnink, A. [4 ]
Solimando, E. [1 ]
Ladriere, M. [1 ]
Kennel, A. [4 ]
Rossignol, P. [2 ,3 ]
Kessler, M. [1 ]
Frimat, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] CHRU Nancy Brabois, Serv Nephrol & Transplantat Renale, 4 Rue Morvan, F-54500 Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[2] Univ Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, INSERM, Ctr Invest Clin Plurithemat 1433, Nancy, France
[3] F CRIN INI CRCT, Nancy, France
[4] CHRU Nancy Brabois, Lab Histocompatiblite, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
关键词
DONOR IMPROVE OUTCOMES; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; WAITING TIME; DIALYSIS; RECIPIENTS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.08.007
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. There are discrepancies regarding the impact of preemptive 2nd kidney transplantation (PSKT) on graft survival. The present study aimed to determine whether the association between PSKT and outcome varies over time and whether this association is era dependent. Methods. A total of 266 patients underwent SKT (244 non-PSKT, 22 PSKT) in our center from 1985 to 2015. Association between PSKT and graft survival (allograft failure from any cause including death) was assessed with the use of Cox models. Results. During a median follow-up of 6.7 years, 116 events were recorded: 72 returns to dialysis and 44 deaths before return to dialysis. Survival curves diverged up to 5 years (5-year survivals: PSKT, 94.1 +/- 5.7%; non-PSKT, 76.8 +/- 2.9%) but they converged thereafter (12-year survivals: PSKT, 50.9 +/- 15.2%; non-PSKT, 55.5 +/- 3.9%). After adjustment for age and living-donor status, PSKT tended to be associated with better graft survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-1.27; P = .08) within the first 5 years of SKT but tended to be associated with worse outcome thereafter (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 0.97-5.72; P = .06; P for interaction with time = .04). In addition, a significant interaction was identified between PSKT and SKT year (P for interaction = .04). In the multivariable model, the estimated HR for PSKT was 2.54 (95% CI, 0.88-7.35; P = .08) in 1990 as opposed to 0.16 (95% CI, 0.02-1.17; P = .07) in 2012. Conclusions. The effect of PSKT on graft survival varies over time and according to year of the procedure. Although the benefit observed within the first 5 years of SKT appears to fade over time, overall graft survival seemingly improved in more recent years.
引用
收藏
页码:2663 / 2668
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Does pre-emptive transplantation versus post start of dialysis transplantation with a kidney from a living donor improve outcomes after transplantation? A systematic literature review and position statement by the Descartes Working Group and ERBP [J].
Abramowicz, Daniel ;
Hazzan, Marc ;
Maggiore, Umberto ;
Peruzzi, Licia ;
Cochat, Pierre ;
Oberbauer, Rainer ;
Haller, Maria C. ;
Van Biesen, Wim .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 31 (05) :691-697
[2]   Summary of the British Transplantation Society Guidelines for Management of the Failing Kidney Transplant [J].
Andrews, Peter A. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 (11) :1130-1133
[3]   Independent of Nephrectomy, Weaning Immunosuppression Leads to Late Sensitization After Kidney Transplant Failure [J].
Augustine, Joshua J. ;
Woodside, Kenneth J. ;
Padiyar, Aparna ;
Sanchez, Edmund Q. ;
Hricik, Donald E. ;
Schulak, James A. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 94 (07) :738-743
[4]  
Collins A, 2014, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V63, pE1
[5]   Donor-Specific Antibodies after Ceasing Immunosuppressive Therapy, with or without an Allograft Nephrectomy [J].
Del Bello, Arnaud ;
Congy-Jolivet, Nicolas ;
Sallusto, Federico ;
Guilbeau-Frugier, Celine ;
Cardeau-Desangles, Isabelle ;
Fort, Marylise ;
Esposito, Laure ;
Guitard, Joelle ;
Cointault, Olivier ;
Lavayssiere, Laurence ;
Nogier, Marie Beatrice ;
Blancher, Antoine ;
Rostaing, Lionel ;
Kamar, Nassim .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 7 (08) :1310-1319
[6]   Pre-Emptive Retransplantation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Graft Failure [J].
Florit, E. A. ;
Bennis, S. ;
Rodriguez, E. ;
Revuelta, I. ;
De Sousa, E. ;
Esforzado, N. ;
Cofan, F. ;
Ricart, M. J. ;
Torregrosa, J. V. ;
Cannpistol, J. M. ;
Oppenheimer, F. ;
Diekmann, F. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2015, 47 (08) :2351-2353
[7]   Why do preemptive kidney transplant recipients have an allograft survival advantage? [J].
Gill, JS ;
Tonelli, M ;
Johnson, N ;
Pereira, BJG .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (06) :873-879
[8]   Duration of end-stage renal disease and kidney transplant outcome [J].
Goldfarb-Rumyantzev, A ;
Hurdle, JF ;
Scandling, J ;
Wang, Z ;
Baird, B ;
Barenbaum, L ;
Cheung, AK .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 (01) :167-175
[9]   The role of pre-emptive re-transplant in graft and recipient outcome [J].
Goldfarb-Rumyantzev, AS ;
Hurdle, JF ;
Baird, BC ;
Stoddard, G ;
Wang, Z ;
Scandling, JD ;
Barenbaum, LL ;
Cheung, AK .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 21 (05) :1355-1364
[10]   Coronary-artery calcification in young adults with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis [J].
Goodman, WG ;
Goldin, J ;
Kuizon, BD ;
Yoon, C ;
Gales, B ;
Sider, D ;
Wang, Y ;
Chung, J ;
Emerick, A ;
Greaser, L ;
Elashoff, RM ;
Salusky, IB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (20) :1478-1483