Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea

被引:8
作者
Choi, Yeongho [1 ,2 ]
Park, Jeong Ho [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Ki Jeong [1 ,2 ]
Ro, Young Sun [1 ,2 ]
Song, Kyoung Jun [1 ,3 ]
Do Shin, Sang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Lab Emergency Med Serv, Biomed Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Metropolitan Govt Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Boramae Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
accident & emergency medicine; neurological injury; trauma management; HEAD-INJURY; TRIAGE; IDENTIFICATION; ALGORITHMS; PROGNOSIS; MODELS; SIGNS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055918
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Predicting diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) at the prehospital stage is challenging; however, using comprehensive prehospital information and machine learning may improve the performance of the predictive model. We developed and tested predictive models for TBI that use machine learning algorithms using information that can be obtained in the prehospital stage. Design This was a multicentre retrospective study. Setting and participants This study was conducted at three tertiary academic emergency departments (EDs) located in an urban area of South Korea. The data from adult patients with severe trauma who were assessed by emergency medical service providers and transported to three participating hospitals between 2014 to 2018 were analysed. Results We developed and tested five machine learning algorithms-logistic regression analyses, extreme gradient boosting, support vector machine, random forest and elastic net (EN)-to predict TBI, TBI with intracranial haemorrhage or injury (TBI-I), TBI with ED or admission result of admission or transferred (TBI with non-discharge (TBI-ND)) and TBI with ED or admission result of death (TBI-D). A total of 1169 patients were included in the final analysis, and the proportions of TBI, TBI-I, TBI-ND and TBI-D were 24.0%, 21.5%, 21.3% and 3.7%, respectively. The EN model yielded an area under receiver-operator curve of 0.799 for TBI, 0.844 for TBI-I, 0.811 for TBI-ND and 0.871 for TBI-D. The EN model also yielded the highest specificity and significant reclassification improvement. Variables related to loss of consciousness, Glasgow Coma Scale and light reflex were the three most important variables to predict all outcomes. Conclusion Our results inform the diagnosis and prognosis of TBI. Machine learning models resulted in significant performance improvement over that with logistic regression analyses, and the best performing model was EN.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with post traumatic brain injury using National Trauma Registry and Machine Learning Approach [J].
Abujaber, Ahmad ;
Fadlalla, Adam ;
Gammoh, Diala ;
Abdelrahman, Husham ;
Mollazehi, Monira ;
El-Menyar, Ayman .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 28 (01)
[2]   Incidence of Hospital-Admitted Severe Traumatic Brain Injury and In-Hospital Fatality in Norway: A National Cohort Study [J].
Andelic, N. ;
Anke, A. ;
Skandsen, T. ;
Sigurdardottir, S. ;
Sandhaug, M. ;
Ader, T. ;
Roe, C. .
NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 38 (04) :259-267
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, APPL LOGISTIC REGRES
[4]   Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury [J].
Badjatia, Neeraj ;
Carney, Nancy ;
Crocco, Todd J. ;
Fallat, Mary Elizabeth ;
Hennes, Halim M. A. ;
Jagoda, Andrew S. ;
Jernigan, Sarah ;
Letarte, Peter B. ;
Lerner, E. Brooke ;
Moriarty, Thomas M. ;
Pons, Peter T. ;
Sasser, Scott ;
Scalea, Thomas ;
Schleien, Charles L. ;
Wright, David W. .
PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2008, 12 :S1-S52
[5]   Access to trauma centers in the United States [J].
Branas, CC ;
MacKenzie, EJ ;
Williams, JC ;
Schwab, CW ;
Teter, HM ;
Flanigan, MC ;
Blatt, AJ ;
ReVelle, CS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (21) :2626-2633
[6]   Defining pediatric traumatic brain injury using International Classification of Diseases Version 10 Codes: A systematic review [J].
Chan, Vincy ;
Thurairajah, Pravheen ;
Colantonio, Angela .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2015, 15
[7]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[8]   A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models [J].
Christodoulou, Evangelia ;
Ma, Jie ;
Collins, Gary S. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Verbakel, Jan Y. ;
Van Calster, Ben .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 110 :12-22
[9]  
Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P735, DOI [10.7326/L15-5093-2, 10.7326/L15-5093]
[10]  
ESPOSITO TJ, 1995, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V130, P171