Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography for the identification of LV mass and volume regression indices 6 months after mitral valve repair

被引:12
作者
Guenzinger, R. [1 ]
Wildhirt, S. M. [1 ]
Voegele, K. [2 ]
Wagner, I. [1 ]
Schwaiger, M. [2 ]
Bauernschmitt, R. [1 ]
Lange, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, German Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, D-80636 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Nucl Med, D-80636 Munich, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8191.2007.00558.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and transthoracic echocardiography have been shown to be noninvasive highly sensitive diagnostic tools to identify changes in LV mass and volume. We therefore investigated the effects of mitral valve repair (MVR) on LV function parameters including ejection fraction (EF; %), indices of LV mass (LVMI; g/m(2)) and volume (LVEDVI, LVESVI; mL/m(2)) as detected by MRI and echocardiography. Methods: Eight consecutive patients (mean age 53.3 +/- 10.0 years) with severe mitral regurgitation (MR; grade III-IV), normal LV function and sinus rhythm were included in this prospective study. Cine MRI and transthoracic M-mode echocardiography were performed pre-operatively, as well as 6 months post-op, to identify changes in EF and in LV mass and volume. Data are given as mean +/- standard deviation. Results: Post-op MR was grade 0-I in all patients. Early mortality and late mortality was 0%. EF by either method did not change significantly within the follow-up period. A significant improvement of indices of LV mass and volume was detected by Cine MRI and echocardiography within 6 months following surgery (LVMIMRI: pre-op: 76.3 +/- 20.1 vs. post-op: 66.5 +/- 14.3, p < 0.05; LVMIEcho: pre-op: 184.2 +/- 38.1 vs. post-op: 136.5 +/- 28.4, p < 0.05. LVEDVIMRI: pre-op: 119.3 +/- 26.0 vs. post-op: 75.4 +/- 13.1, p < 0.05; LVEDVIEcho: pre-op: 97.4 +/- 28.8 vs. post-op: 69.2 +/- 13.1, p < 0.05. LVESVIMRI: pre-op: 44.6 +/- 12.0 vs. post-op: 32.5 +/- 9.5, p < 0.05; LVESVIEcho: pre-op: 29.3 +/- 8.3 vs. post-op: 21.8 +/- 4.6, p < 0.05). Conclusions: MRI and echocardiography show a significant reduction of LV volume and mass 6 months after MVR. The data show that for routine follow-up transthoracic M-mode echocardiography provides reliable information for the identification of LV mass and volume regression in patients after MVR.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 132
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Whole-body MR imaging in 30 seconds with real-time true FISP and a continuously rolling table platform: Feasibility study [J].
Barkhausen, J ;
Quick, HH ;
Lauenstein, T ;
Goyen, M ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Laub, G ;
Debatin, JF ;
Ladd, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) :252-256
[2]   MR evaluation of ventricular function: True fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: Feasibility study [J].
Barkhausen, J ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Goyen, M ;
Buck, T ;
Laub, G ;
Debatin, JF .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (01) :264-269
[3]   Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance - Are they interchangeable? [J].
Bellenger, NG ;
Burgess, MI ;
Ray, SG ;
Lahiri, A ;
Coats, AJS ;
Cleland, JGF ;
Pennell, DJ .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 (16) :1387-1396
[4]   Lack of agreement between left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction determined by two-dimensional echocardiography and contrast cineangiography in postinfarction patients [J].
Bernard, Y ;
Meneveau, N ;
Boucher, S ;
Magnin, D ;
Anguenot, T ;
Schiele, F ;
Vuillemenot, A ;
Bassand, JP .
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2001, 18 (02) :113-122
[5]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING COMPARED TO ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY TO ASSESS LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS IN THE HYPERTENSIVE PATIENT [J].
BOTTINI, PB ;
CARR, AA ;
PRISANT, LM ;
FLICKINGER, FW ;
ALLISON, JD ;
GOTTDIENER, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1995, 8 (03) :221-228
[6]   Prognostic significance of left ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension [J].
Devereux, RB ;
Wachtell, K ;
Gerdts, E ;
Boman, K ;
Nieminen, MS ;
Papademetriou, V ;
Rokkedal, J ;
Harris, K ;
Aurup, P ;
Dahlöf, B .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (19) :2350-2356
[7]   ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY - COMPARISON TO NECROPSY FINDINGS [J].
DEVEREUX, RB ;
ALONSO, DR ;
LUTAS, EM ;
GOTTLIEB, GJ ;
CAMPO, E ;
SACHS, I ;
REICHEK, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1986, 57 (06) :450-458
[8]   Early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve 14 replacement by the ross procedure detected by Cine MRI [J].
Djavidani, B ;
Schmid, FX ;
Keyser, A ;
Butz, B ;
Seitz, J ;
Luchner, A ;
Debl, K ;
Feuerbach, S ;
Nitz, WR .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2004, 6 (01) :1-8
[9]   The mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position:: Hemodynamic performance after 2 years [J].
Eichinger, WB ;
Schütz, A ;
Simmerl, D ;
Gansera, BU ;
Breuer, M ;
Haslinger, B ;
Kemkes, BM .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 66 (06) :S126-S129
[10]   European experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis [J].
Eichinger, WB ;
Botzenhardt, F ;
Gunzinger, R ;
Kemkes, BM ;
Sosnowski, A ;
Maïza, D ;
Coto, EO ;
Bleese, N .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 124 (02) :333-339