Medical Physics 3.0: Ensuring Quality and Safety in Medical Imaging

被引:3
作者
Samei, Ehsan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr,Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Med Phys Grad Program,Dept Radiol, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs,RAI Labs, 2424 Erwin Rd,Suite 302, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr,Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Med Phys Grad Program,Dept Phys, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs,RAI Labs, 2424 Erwin Rd,Suite 302, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr,Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Med Phys Grad Program,Dept Biomed Engn, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs,RAI Labs, 2424 Erwin Rd,Suite 302, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr,Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Med Phys Grad Program,Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs,RAI Labs, 2424 Erwin Rd,Suite 302, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2019年 / 116卷 / 02期
关键词
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; medical imaging; medical physics; optimization; PATIENT-SPECIFIC QUANTIFICATION; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; AUTOMATED TECHNIQUE; CT; PERFORMANCE; INDEX; NOISE; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/HP.0000000000001022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Medical imaging often involves radiation and thus radiation protection. Radiation protection in medicine is only one component of the broader calling of health care professionals: fostering human health. As such, radiation risk needs to be put into the context of the larger mandate of improved outcomes in health care. Medical physicists, according to the new vision of Medical Physics 3.0, make a significant contribution to this mandate as they engage proactively and meaningfully in patient care. Facing the new realities of value-based, personalized, and evidence-based practice, Medical Physics 3.0 is an initiative to make physics inform every patient's care by fostering new skills and expanding horizons for the medical physics profession. It provides a framework by which medical physicists can maintain and improve their integral roles in, and contributions to, health care, its innovation, and its precision. One way that Medical Physics 3.0 will manifest itself in medical imaging practice is by engaging physicists to ensure the precise and optimized use of radiation. Optimization takes place through knowing the defining attributes of the technology in use, the specifics of the patient's situation, and the goals of the imaging and/or intervention. The safety as well as the quality of the procedure is ascertained quantitatively and optimized prospectively, ensuring a proper balance between quality and safety to offer maximum potential benefit to the patient. The results of procedures across the health care operation are then retrospectively analyzed to ensure that each procedure has, in actuality, delivered the targeted quality and safety objectives. Characterizing quality and safety in quantitative terms, objectively optimizing them in the practice of personalized care, and analyzing the results from clinical operations all require the unique combination of precision and innovation that physicists bring to the development and practice of medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 255
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Patient-specific quantification of image quality: An automated technique for measuring the distribution of organ Hounsfield units in clinical chest CT images
    Abadi, Ehsan
    Sanders, Jeremiah
    Samei, Ehsan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (09) : 4736 - 4746
  • [2] Automated Technique to Measure Noise in Clinical CT Examinations
    Christianson, Olav
    Winslow, James
    Frush, Donald P.
    Samei, Ehsan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (01) : W93 - W99
  • [3] An Improved Index of Image Quality for Task-based Performance of CT Iterative Reconstruction across Three Commercial Implementations
    Christianson, Olav
    Chen, Joseph J. S.
    Yang, Zhitong
    Saiprasad, Ganesh
    Dima, Alden
    Filliben, James J.
    Peskin, Adele
    Trimble, Christopher
    Siegel, Eliot L.
    Samei, Ehsan
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (03) : 725 - 734
  • [4] Automated size-specific CT dose monitoring program: Assessing variability in CT dose
    Christianson, Olav
    Li, Xiang
    Frush, Donald
    Samei, Ehsan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (11) : 7131 - 7139
  • [5] Davis JT, 2017, RSNA 17
  • [6] International Commission on Radiological Protection, 2017, USITC PUBL, V135
  • [7] Patient-specific Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk for Pediatric Chest CT
    Li, Xiang
    Samei, Ehsan
    Segars, W. Paul
    Sturgeon, Gregory M.
    Colsher, James G.
    Frush, Donald P.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (03) : 862 - 874
  • [8] An image-based technique to assess the perceptual quality of clinical chest radiographs
    Lin, Yuan
    Luo, Hui
    Dobbins, James T., III
    McAdams, H. Page
    Wang, Xiaohui
    Sehnert, William J.
    Barski, Lori
    Foos, David H.
    Samei, Ehsan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (11) : 7019 - 7031
  • [9] Ria F, 2017, ANN M AM ASS PHYS ME
  • [10] Image noise and dose performance across a clinical population: Patient size adaptation as a metric of CT performance
    Ria, Francesco
    Wilson, Joshua Mark
    Zhang, Yakun
    Samei, Ehsan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2141 - 2147