Optimizing complex building design for annual daylighting performance and evaluation of optimization algorithms

被引:55
|
作者
Futrell, Benjamin J. [1 ]
Ozelkan, Ertunga C. [2 ]
Brentrup, Dale [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Architecture Infrastruct & Environm Syst, PhD Program, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Syst Engn & Engn Management, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Architecture, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Building energy simulation; Dynamic daylighting simulation; Climate-based daylighting metrics; Optimization; Simulation optimization; OFFICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
We address the challenging problem of optimizing building design for daylighting performance to minimize lighting loads, which is one of the two largest sources of energy consumption in buildings, besides thermal loads. We present a methodology to optimize complex building design for daylighting performance that uses dynamic climate-based lighting simulations. We compare four optimization algorithms as implemented in GenOpt: Simplex Algorithm of Nelder and Mead with the Extension of O'Neill (SA), Hooke Jeeves (HJ), Particle Swarm Optimization using Inertia Weight (PSOIW), and a hybrid PSO Constriction/Hooke Jeeves (PSOC/HJ) algorithm. The results indicate that the design space region of optimum performance is typically found quickly by all algorithms, but converge is sometimes slow. SA and HJ typically reached convergence in fewer function evaluations than PSOIW and PSOC/HJ; however, they did not consistently find solutions close to the overall best solution found. PSOIW found the best overall solution and consistently found other solutions close to it, but always took longest to converge. PSOC/HJ reached convergence more quickly than PSOIW and consistently found solutions slightly below the overall best solution found. While our work presented here focused on optimizing for daylighting performance in isolation of thermal envelope loads, the best daylighting design had annual summed lighting and thermal loads 33% lower than the best design optimized for thermal performance without consideration for daylighting. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 245
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design optimization of building geometry and fenestration for daylighting and energy performance
    Fang, Yuan
    Cho, Soolyeon
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 191 : 7 - 18
  • [2] Algorithms for optimization of building design: A review
    Machairas, Vasileios
    Tsangrassoulis, Aris
    Axarli, Kleo
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 31 : 101 - 112
  • [3] Bi-objective optimization of building enclosure design for thermal and lighting performance
    Futrell, Benjamin J.
    Ozelkan, Ertunga C.
    Brentrup, Dale
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 92 : 591 - 602
  • [4] Design, performance evaluation and optimization of a UAV
    Kontogiannis, Spyridon G.
    Ekaterinaris, John A.
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 29 (01) : 339 - 350
  • [5] Multi-Variable Optimization of Building Thermal Design Using Genetic Algorithms
    Ferdyn-Grygierek, Joanna
    Grygierek, Krzysztof
    ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (10):
  • [6] Daylighting Design Optimization of Complex Fenestration Systems with External Shading and Horizontal Slats in Tropical Elementary School Classrooms
    Aritonang, Sofhia Ribka
    Mangkuto, Rizki A.
    Atthaillah, Iwan
    Prasetiyo, Iwan
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [7] A comprehensive method for optimizing the design of a regular architectural space to improve building performance
    Zou, Yukai
    Zhan, Qiaosheng
    Xiang, Ke
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 : 981 - 996
  • [8] Comparative evaluation of different optimization algorithms for structural design applications
    Patnaik, SN
    Coroneos, RM
    Guptill, JD
    Hopkins, DA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1996, 39 (10) : 1761 - 1774
  • [9] Modeling and optimization method for building energy performance in the design stage
    Li, Cong
    Chen, Youming
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 87
  • [10] Performance comparison of optimization algorithms in LQR controller design for a nonlinear system
    Onen, Umit
    Cakan, Abdullah
    Ilhan, Ilhan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2019, 27 (03) : 1938 - 1953