When choice motivates and when it does not

被引:289
作者
Katz, Idit [1 ]
Assor, Avi [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Educ, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
autonomy support; provision of choice; motivation; self-determination theory; psychological needs;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-006-9027-y
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This article addresses the controversy regarding the value of offering choices as a teaching practice. Inconsistent of results regarding the effects of choice in various settings suggest that choice can be either motivating or de-motivating. Based on the self-determination theory of motivation (Deci & Ryan, 2000), we propose that choice can be motivating when the options meet the students' need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. For example, choice is motivating when the options are relevant to the students' interests and goals (autonomy support), are not too numerous or complex (competence support), and are congruent with the values of the students' culture (relatedness support). Given the many factors involved, it is not surprising that in some studies choice was not found to promote engagement. However, when choice was offered in a way that met the needs of the students, it was found to enhance motivation, learning, and well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 442
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Alfi O., 2004, J EDUC TEACHING, V30, P27, DOI DOI 10.1080/0260747032000162299
[2]   Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork [J].
Assor, A ;
Kaplan, H ;
Roth, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 72 :261-278
[3]   Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety [J].
Assor, A ;
Kaplan, H ;
Kanat-Maymon, Y ;
Roth, G .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2005, 15 (05) :397-413
[4]  
Assor A., 2005, Advances in Motivation and Achievement, V14, P105, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0749-7423(05)14005-9, 10.1016/S0749-7423(05)14005-9]
[5]  
Assor A., 2001, Trends and prospects in motivational research, P101
[6]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[7]   Caring school communities [J].
Battistich, V ;
Solomon, D ;
Watson, M ;
Schaps, E .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 32 (03) :137-151
[8]   Children's choice strategies: the effects of age and task demands [J].
Bereby-Meyer, Y ;
Assor, A ;
Katz, I .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 19 (01) :127-146
[9]   TEACHER PRAISE - A FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS [J].
BROPHY, J .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1981, 51 (01) :5-32
[10]   NEGATIVE REACTIONS TO INCREASES IN PERCEIVED PERSONAL CONTROL [J].
BURGER, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 56 (02) :246-256