Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques

被引:102
作者
Baarslag, Tim [1 ]
Hendrikx, Mark J. C. [2 ]
Hindriks, Koen V. [2 ]
Jonker, Catholijn M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Negotiation; Software agents; Opponent model; Learning techniques; Automated negotiation; Opponent modeling; Machine learning; Survey; MULTI-ISSUE NEGOTIATION; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; TRADE-OFFS; AGENTS; STRATEGY; PREFERENCES; REGRESSION; SUPPORT; SYSTEMS; BEHAVIORS;
D O I
10.1007/s10458-015-9309-1
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A negotiation between agents is typically an incomplete information game, where the agents initially do not know their opponent's preferences or strategy. This poses a challenge, as efficient and effective negotiation requires the bidding agent to take the other's wishes and future behavior into account when deciding on a proposal. Therefore, in order to reach better and earlier agreements, an agent can apply learning techniques to construct a model of the opponent. There is a mature body of research in negotiation that focuses on modeling the opponent, but there exists no recent survey of commonly used opponent modeling techniques. This work aims to advance and integrate knowledge of the field by providing a comprehensive survey of currently existing opponent models in a bilateral negotiation setting. We discuss all possible ways opponent modeling has been used to benefit agents so far, and we introduce a taxonomy of currently existing opponent models based on their underlying learning techniques. We also present techniques to measure the success of opponent models and provide guidelines for deciding on the appropriate performance measures for every opponent model type in our taxonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 898
页数:50
相关论文
共 206 条
[61]   A comparative study of game theoretic and evolutionary models of bargaining for software agents [J].
Fatima, SS ;
Wooldridge, M ;
Jennings, NR .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2005, 23 (02) :185-203
[62]  
Fatima SS, 2002, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V2333, P377
[63]  
Ficici S. G., 2008, P 7 INT JOINT C AUT, P315
[64]  
Fürnkranz J, 2001, ADV COMP THE PRACT, V8, P11
[65]  
Gal K, 2015, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V596, P129, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-55525-4_8
[66]  
Gal Yaakov., 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IJCAI workshop on reasoning, representation, and learning in computer games, P25
[67]  
Gerding E. H., 2000, TECHNICAL REPORT
[68]   ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS WITH ZERO-INTELLIGENCE TRADERS - MARKET AS A PARTIAL SUBSTITUTE FOR INDIVIDUAL RATIONALITY [J].
GODE, DK ;
SUNDER, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1993, 101 (01) :119-137
[69]  
Guttman R. H., 1999, Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce. First International Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Trading. AMET-98. Selected Papers, P70
[70]   Adaptive Negotiation for Resource Intensive Tasks in Grids [J].
Haberland, Valeriia ;
Miles, Simon ;
Luck, Michael .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH STARTING AI RESEARCHERS' SYMPOSIUM (STAIRS 2012), 2012, 241 :125-+