Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques

被引:101
作者
Baarslag, Tim [1 ]
Hendrikx, Mark J. C. [2 ]
Hindriks, Koen V. [2 ]
Jonker, Catholijn M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Negotiation; Software agents; Opponent model; Learning techniques; Automated negotiation; Opponent modeling; Machine learning; Survey; MULTI-ISSUE NEGOTIATION; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; TRADE-OFFS; AGENTS; STRATEGY; PREFERENCES; REGRESSION; SUPPORT; SYSTEMS; BEHAVIORS;
D O I
10.1007/s10458-015-9309-1
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A negotiation between agents is typically an incomplete information game, where the agents initially do not know their opponent's preferences or strategy. This poses a challenge, as efficient and effective negotiation requires the bidding agent to take the other's wishes and future behavior into account when deciding on a proposal. Therefore, in order to reach better and earlier agreements, an agent can apply learning techniques to construct a model of the opponent. There is a mature body of research in negotiation that focuses on modeling the opponent, but there exists no recent survey of commonly used opponent modeling techniques. This work aims to advance and integrate knowledge of the field by providing a comprehensive survey of currently existing opponent models in a bilateral negotiation setting. We discuss all possible ways opponent modeling has been used to benefit agents so far, and we introduce a taxonomy of currently existing opponent models based on their underlying learning techniques. We also present techniques to measure the success of opponent models and provide guidelines for deciding on the appropriate performance measures for every opponent model type in our taxonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 898
页数:50
相关论文
共 206 条
[111]  
Lau RYK, 2005, SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, SELECTED PROCEEDINGS, P271
[112]   An evolutionary learning approach for adaptive negotiation agents [J].
Lau, RYK ;
Tang, ML ;
Wong, O ;
Milliner, SW ;
Chen, YPP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2006, 21 (01) :41-72
[113]   A neural networks approach for forecasting the supplier's bid prices in supplier selection negotiation process [J].
Lee, Chun Ching ;
Ou-Yang, C. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (02) :2961-2970
[114]  
Leonardz B., 1973, STOP NOT STOP SOME E
[115]  
Lewicki R., 2003, ESSENTIALS NEGOTIATI
[116]   Bilateral negotiation decisions with uncertain dynamic outside options [J].
Li, CH ;
Giampapa, J ;
Sycara, K .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2006, 36 (01) :31-44
[117]   Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent [J].
Lin, Raz ;
Kraus, Sarit ;
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan ;
Barry, James .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 172 (6-7) :823-851
[118]   GENIUS: AN INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENT FOR SUPPORTING THE DESIGN OF GENERIC AUTOMATED NEGOTIATORS [J].
Lin, Raz ;
Kraus, Sarit ;
Baarslag, Tim ;
Tykhonov, Dmytro ;
Hindriks, Koen ;
Jonker, Catholijn M. .
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2014, 30 (01) :48-70
[119]  
Lin R, 2006, FRONT ARTIF INTEL AP, V141, P270
[120]   Can Automated Agents Proficiently Negotiate With Humans? [J].
Lin, Raz ;
Kraus, Sarit .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2010, 53 (01) :78-88