The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

被引:21
作者
Stilling, Maiken [1 ]
Larsen, Kristian [3 ]
Andersen, Niels T. [2 ]
Soballe, Kjeld [1 ]
Kold, Soren [1 ]
Rahbek, Ole [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Hosp Unit W, Dept Orthoped, Orthoped Res Unit, Holstebro, Denmark
关键词
BACKED ACETABULAR CUPS; MODEL-BASED RSA; FEMORAL-HEAD; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; TRUE WEAR; PENETRATION; OSTEOLYSIS; REPLACEMENT; ZIRCONIA; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.3109/17453674.2010.506632
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Methods Measurements of PE wear postoperatively and at final follow-up (after mean 6 years) on plain radiographs of 12 patients after cementless THA were evaluated with PolyWare software and the results were compared with those from RSA as the gold standard (Model-based RSA using elementary geometrical shape models; EGS-RSA). With PolyWare, we either used the final radiographic follow-up (PW1) only or both the postoperative follow-up and the final follow-up (PW2). Results The 2D mean wear measured (in mm) was 0.80, 1.07, and 0.60 for the PW2, PW1, and RSA method. 2D intra-method repeatability was similar for PW1 and RSA with limits of agreement (LOAs, in mm) of +/- 0.22, and +/- 0.23, respectively. 2D inter-method concurrent validity was best between PW1 and EGS-RSA with LOAs of +/- 0.55. For 2D linear wear measurements, the PW1 method had a clinical repeatability similar to that of RSA. Interpretation PW1 is sufficient for retrospective determination of 2D wear from medium-term wear measurements above 0.5 mm, It alleviates the need for baseline plain radiographs, has a clinical precision similar to that of RSA, and is easy and inexpensive to use.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 578
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Multidirectional deformation in fully congruent acetabular components
    Akisue, T
    Bauer, TW
    Yamaguchi, M
    Matejczyk, MB
    Stulberg, BN
    Wilde, AH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1999, 14 (08) : 1011 - 1018
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
  • [3] [Anonymous], STAND PRACT US TERMS
  • [4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [5] Bossuyt PM, 2003, CLIN BIOCHEM, V36, P2
  • [6] Comparison of femoral head penetration using RSA and the Martell method
    Bragdon, Charles R.
    Martell, John M.
    Greene, Meridith E.
    Estok, Daniel M., II
    Thanner, Jonas
    Karrholm, Johan
    Harris, William H.
    Malchau, Henrik
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (448) : 52 - 57
  • [7] Evaluation of contemporary software methods used to quantify polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty
    Collier, MB
    Kraay, MJ
    Rimnac, CM
    Goldberg, VM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (12) : 2410 - 2418
  • [8] Cooper R A, 1992, J Arthroplasty, V7, P285, DOI 10.1016/0883-5403(92)90050-Z
  • [9] Devane P., 1995, Clin Orthop Relat Res, V319, P303
  • [10] Devane P.A., 1995, Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, V319, P317