Impact of Protocolized Pharmacist Intervention on Critical Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Values With Heparin Infusions

被引:0
|
作者
Barry, Rachelle [1 ]
Stevens, Craig A. [2 ]
Huynh, Trina [2 ]
Lerner, Dmitri [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif, Davis Hlth, Sacramento, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego Hlth, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
anticoagulation; unfractionated heparin; therapeutic monitoring; clinical pharmacy; quality assurance; drug monitoring; clinical decision making; XA MEASUREMENTS; THERAPY; ANTICOAGULANTS; WEIGHT;
D O I
10.1177/87551225211031923
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions are commonly managed with nurse-driven nomograms titrated to activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In some patients, anti-Xa values may be more appropriate measures of anticoagulation. At the present institution, an update to the nurse-driven aPTT nomogram requires pharmacist notification and clinical assessment for critically supratherapeutic aPTT results. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the nomogram update. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, pre-post analysis was conducted in patients treated with UFH who experienced a critical aPTT during the 6 months preceding and following the nomogram update. Patients with erroneous critical aPTT results were excluded. The primary endpoint was the time in therapeutic range (Rosendaal method) from the first critical aPTT until UFH discontinuation. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients transitioned to anti-Xa monitoring and the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, 5 bleeding. Data were analyzed by the chi(2) test. The study was institutional review board approved. Results: Of 277 UFH infusions, 142 belonged to the pre-implementation group and 135 to the post-implementation group. Baseline aPTTs were similar between the 2 groups. Time in therapeutic range was 58.1% versus 62.4% of between groups (P = .467). UFH was transitioned to pharmacist-driven anti-Xa monitoring in 16.2% versus 40.3% of patients (P < .001). BARC 2, 3, 5 bleeding occurred in 23.2% versus 13.4% of patients (P < .001). Conclusions: Application of these data suggest improved safety and efficacy outcomes with directed pharmacist management of UFH in patients with critically elevated aPTTs.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 233
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Substitution of a heparin correlation value for activated partial thromboplastin time in heparin nomograms
    Miller, Abigail E.
    Montague, Deborah
    Rodgers, Jo E.
    Sanghvi, Sonali
    Whinna, Herbert C.
    Krumnacher, Heather
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2011, 68 (10) : 893 - 898
  • [2] Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin: A Review of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Versus Antifactor Xa
    Parker, Christine R.
    Kataria, Vivek
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 30 (04) : 305 - 312
  • [3] Evaluation of a bedside device to assess the activated partial thromboplastin time for heparin monitoring in infants
    Klein, Richard H.
    van der Vorst, Marja M. J.
    de Wilde, Rob B. P.
    Hogenbirk, Karin
    de Kam, Marieke L.
    Burggraaf, Jacobus
    BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 2013, 24 (03) : 327 - 331
  • [4] An ex vivo comparison of partial thromboplastin time and activated clotting time for heparin anticoagulation in an ovine model
    Berk, Zachary B. K.
    Shah, Aakash
    Sun, Wenji
    Griffith, Bartley P.
    Wu, Zhongjun J.
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2022, 46 (03) : 501 - 505
  • [5] Performance of Anti-Factor Xa Versus Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time for Heparin Monitoring Using Multiple Nomograms
    Whitman-Purves, Emily
    Coons, James C.
    Miller, Taylor
    DiNella, Jeannine V.
    Althouse, Andrew
    Schmidhofer, Mark
    Smith, Roy E.
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2018, 24 (02) : 310 - 316
  • [6] Antifactor Xa levels vs. activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin. A pilot study
    Samuel, S.
    Allison, T. A.
    Sharaf, S.
    Yau, G.
    Ranjbar, G.
    Mckaig, N.
    Nguyen, A.
    Escobar, M.
    Choi, H. A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 41 (05) : 499 - 502
  • [7] Evaluation of Antifactor-Xa Heparin Assay and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Values in Patients on Therapeutic Continuous Infusion Unfractionated Heparin Therapy
    McLaughlin, Kevin
    Rimsans, Jessica
    Sylvester, Katelyn W.
    Fanikos, John
    Dorfman, David M.
    Senna, Patricia
    Connors, Jean M.
    Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2019, 25
  • [8] Comparison of Anti-Xa and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Monitoring for Heparin Dosing in Patients With Cirrhosis
    Fuentes, Amaris
    Gordon-Burroughs, Sherilyn
    Hall, Jeffrey B.
    Putney, David R.
    Monsour, Howard P., Jr.
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2015, 37 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [9] Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time and Anti-Xa Measurements in Heparin Monitoring: Biochemical Basis for Discordance
    Takemoto, Clifford M.
    Streiff, Michael B.
    Shermock, Kenneth M.
    Kraus, Peggy S.
    Chen, Junnan
    Jani, Jayesh
    Kickler, Thomas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 139 (04) : 450 - 456
  • [10] From Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time to Antifactor Xa and Back AgainThe Evolution of Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin
    May, Jori E.
    Siniard, Rance Chad
    Taylor, Laura J.
    Marques, Marisa B.
    Gangaraju, Radhika
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2022, 157 (03) : 321 - 327